This podcast episode features a deep discussion on the impact of feminism within the church and society, highlighting how the traditional roles of men and women have been challenged over the decades.

Zach Garris, author of "Honor Thy Fathers" and "Masculine Christianity" emphasizes the importance of adhering to the teachings of the Reformation, specifically regarding male headship and the roles assigned to women in the home, church, and commonwealth.

Through an exploration of historical figures like John Knox and William Gouge, the conversation underscores the dangers of deviating from these foundational principles, which can lead to a feminization of the church and society.

The episode also critiques contemporary leaders, including Tim Keller and his wife, for their narrow complementarian stance and the implications of their teachings on church practices today. Listeners are encouraged to consider the historical context of these discussions and the potential for reforming modern practices to align more closely with traditional Christian teachings.

Takeaways:

CONNECT WITH ZACH

{{promo-links}}

Transcript
Will Spencer

Hello.

Will Spencer

My name is Will Spencer and thanks.

Zach Garris

For joining me for the Will Spencer podcast.

Zach Garris

This is a weekly interview show featuring extended discussions with authors, leaders, and influencers who can help us make sense of our changing world.

Zach Garris

Today I release new episodes every week on Friday.

Zach Garris

My guest this week is Zach Garris, who's returning to the podcast.

Zach Garris

Zack is a husband, father, pastor, and the author of two books including Masculine.

Will Spencer

Christianity and the new honor Thy fathers.

Zach Garris

Feminism is in the cultural and political crosshairs today.

Will Spencer

Praise God.

Zach Garris

Because for the first time since womens liberation exploded into western consciousness in the mid 20th century, cultural commentators have actual evidence to back up their critiques.

Zach Garris

Naturally, 60 million aborted infants is in itself an incriminating statistic.

Zach Garris

But with marriage and birth rates collapsing, antidepressant use soaring, and women's self reported happiness declining generation over generation, we can see that the feminist experiment is failing in culture, politics, and economics.

Zach Garris

Indeed, it's failing in civilization as a whole, albeit slowly.

Zach Garris

The evidence can even be seen as far away as Korea and Japan.

Zach Garris

With birth rates so far below replacement, they've reached the level of national emergency.

Zach Garris

But strangely, the one place feminism doesn't.

Will Spencer

Appear to be failing is in the.

Zach Garris

Church, which always lags behind the times.

Zach Garris

While the Kamala Harris candidacy is representing both the apex and nadir of feminism, churches are seeking ways to expand feminism's influence in both local and national bodies, despite the clear word of God.

Zach Garris

Otherwise, some churches and national organizations insist that women can be preachers and pastors, putting together endless study commissions to explore something thats been clear for 2000 years.

Zach Garris

And yet some organizations that call themselves churches and yet are not, have gone tragically soft on abortion, claiming it might be a womans choice and we should be more compassionate, less faithful, more empathetic, and less dogmatic.

Zach Garris

Naturally, this is also a result of feminism that prioritizes womens feelings over gods truth.

Zach Garris

Now let me be clear.

Zach Garris

There is also a movement of churches out there that are prioritizing men's feelings primarily of anger, as a result of what we're talking about with women.

Zach Garris

That is not better, it might even be worse.

Zach Garris

And it's another podcast.

Zach Garris

So in the meantime, we can talk about church's capitulations to the demands of feminism without directly answering but what about the men?

Zach Garris

So let's talk about feminism in the church.

Will Spencer

Anyone?

Will Spencer

Anyone?

Zach Garris

Bueller?

Zach Garris

And therein lies the problem.

Zach Garris

Because in a reformed faith that has so much to say about politics, culture and even economics, there's often a shocking silence when it comes to something much more fundamental the nature of men, women, and our shared roles, responsibilities, and destinies together.

Zach Garris

But it wasn't always so.

Zach Garris

Which brings me back to Zach Garris and his new book, honor Thy fathers, out now on new Christendom Press.

Zach Garris

In his brief, inaccessible work, Zack demonstrates the traditional stance of the reformed faith towards feminism, sort of because feminism wasn't really a thing during the age of the reformers.

Zach Garris

But the word of God still rang true, which is why Luther, Calvin, Knox, Turretin Warfield, and many other reformers and Puritans were bracingly clear on women's roles in the home, church and government, namely, that they are not to teach or have authority over men.

Zach Garris

Period.

Zach Garris

Full stop.

Zach Garris

Not that women can't have authority at all, as in over fellow women and children, just not over men.

Zach Garris

That's a hard teaching.

Zach Garris

I know there are so many cultural and political incentives to egalitarianism and what's known as broad complementarianism, which is basically the same thing.

Zach Garris

But the word of God is clear, and things go better for us, men and women, when we submit ourselves to it, because the fifth commandment is the only one with a promise.

Zach Garris

And that is where Zack derived the title of his book from, to help us understand that honoring male authority is following the Fifth Commandment, as elucidated in the Westminster confession of faith and elsewhere.

Zach Garris

So, as Zack writes in one of the most memorable first sentences I've read recently, feminism has fallen on hard times of late.

Zach Garris

But it has not fallen on hard enough times.

Zach Garris

I couldn't agree more, and I hope feminism continues to fall on hard times outside the church and harder times within it.

Zach Garris

May Zach Garriss new book, Honor Thy fathers, contribute to that effort.

Zach Garris

If you enjoy the will Spencer podcast, thank you.

Zach Garris

Please give us a five star rating on Spotify, plus a five star rating and review on Apple Podcasts.

Zach Garris

And if you really want to help this show grow, share this episode or another one of your favorites with a friend of if you'd like to support the show financially, there are some easy ways to do that.

Zach Garris

First, head to Willspencerpod, dot Substack.com and become a paid subscriber.

Zach Garris

You'll get access to ad free interviews every week, plus other perks as the page grows.

Zach Garris

Or you can click buy me a coffee in the show notes.

Zach Garris

But the most important thing you can do is support our advertisers.

Zach Garris

I've curated every advertiser that appears on this show, and purchasing their products and services bring multigenerational wealth back to the christian community so we can rebuild a christian foundation to the west.

Zach Garris

And please welcome this week's guest on the Will Spencer podcast, the author of honor thy fathers, Zach Garris.

Will Spencer

Zach, welcome back to the podcast.

Guest

Thanks for having me.

Will Spencer

I have here the Zach Garris collection, masculine Christianity and honor thy fathers.

Will Spencer

Congratulations on your second book.

Will Spencer

I like to call honor thy fathers the reformed strike back.

Will Spencer

So congratulations on this.

Guest

Thanks.

Guest

Yeah, it's kind of complimentary book, I think, to masculine Christianity.

Will Spencer

Very much so.

Will Spencer

In fact, I remember when I had you on to talk about masculine Christianity maybe a year, year and a half ago, something like that.

Will Spencer

And having read on to thy fathers now, it feels very much like a couple missing chapters and away from masculine Christianity.

Will Spencer

Not that the book felt incomplete, but that the two fit together really well, almost as if they could be the same volume, which is a great way to write a couple books.

Guest

Yeah, I think so.

Guest

I mean, they're obviously different angles.

Guest

They could all go in the same book.

Guest

There's some overlap, but honor thy fathers is more of a historical angle.

Guest

So for people who are interested in that, I think it's useful.

Guest

And then also it does get a little more into, I guess you could say, like the narrow complementarianism in the particular, in the reformed world.

Guest

I mean, there's some of that in masculine Christianity, but, yeah, a little bit different book.

Will Spencer

Yeah, it's definitely a different posture on the same sets of issues.

Will Spencer

So I think I remember masculine Christianity being very heavily heavy on exegesis, like in the posture of these verses, in contrast to what the feminists say about them.

Will Spencer

And then it's let's go and do a historical survey of what our reformed forefathers used to say about these verses, in contrast to more of like the modern approach that the church is taking to egalitarianism, complementarianism and feminism.

Will Spencer

Really?

Guest

Yeah, absolutely.

Will Spencer

So when you sat down to write honor thy fathers, did you have this book sort of like, was it kind of percolating in your mind for a while after masculine Christianity?

Will Spencer

What was the genesis of this book pun allowed?

Guest

Yeah, well, actually I was initially asked to write an essay on, um, basically the reformers on male rule, male headship.

Guest

And so that got, that got things started, and then that actually, the guys who asked me to do that, that ended up not going anywhere.

Guest

And so I had this essay sitting around and I was like, what am I going to do with this?

Guest

It's, it seemed too long, you know, to post on the Internet.

Guest

So then, you know, it's just kind of over time I started adding to it and I had more books I had acquired and was looking through things.

Guest

And I think it was always kind of in the back of my mind because the essay was just sitting there and I hadn't done anything with it.

Guest

So I eventually just kept adding to it and refining it.

Guest

And then I was like, well, I think this could actually make a whole book be a little bit shorter.

Guest

But I think I was able to, you know, add enough that it made for a book.

Guest

And so that's, that.

Guest

That's what came to be.

Guest

Honor thy fathers.

Guest

I mean, it's not, it's not super short, but it's actually maybe the kind of length of book people like to read.

Guest

You know, where it's 100 to 150 pages, Macedonian Christianity was like 300.

Guest

I tend to be not necessarily long winded, but it's easy on, like, a subject like this to.

Guest

To write more.

Guest

So, yeah, that's why I think this book is somewhat useful.

Guest

Is it for people where it's a.

Guest

It is a different angle.

Guest

It's not the same book as Mexican Christianity.

Guest

It has some of the same themes, but in some sense, it's maybe a little more accessible.

Guest

People might actually start with this book and then say, hey, oh, I want to.

Guest

Actually want to read masculine Christianity and dive a little more into the scripture passages.

Guest

So, yeah, I.

Will Spencer

And I know that this came out on new Christendom press, which is, I mean, it's a beautiful book.

Will Spencer

People listening can't really see it, but you should definitely check it out.

Will Spencer

Lovely design and cover.

Will Spencer

And I think one of the things that it captures is this spirit of, hey, these questions that we're struggling with in the church right now, they've been answered.

Will Spencer

This is not new.

Will Spencer

It didn't just spring up out of the ground.

Will Spencer

The reformers dealt with this hundreds of years ago.

Will Spencer

So maybe you can start, maybe you can offer some examples of some of the reformers that you surveyed, some of the things they had to say about some of these egalitarian and feminist kind of questions.

Will Spencer

Because when I saw that recovering the anti feminist theology of the reformers as the subtitle, I'm like, let's go.

Will Spencer

So I appreciated that you dove into that to find some of those things that I think people today needed to hear.

Guest

Yeah, I mean, the subtitle's a little bit anachronistic, right?

Guest

I mean, feminism was not a term back then.

Guest

I mean, they were around before the movement was around.

Guest

But I mean, the thing is, you've always had kind of elements of feminism in the world.

Guest

I mean, you've had rebellion against male rule and God's design and marriage and throughout society.

Guest

And so none of that's new.

Guest

But I think, you know, part of the reason I titled it the anti feminist theology of the reformers is their theology.

Guest

They had a theology of men and women and male headship, and they clearly opposed what we would today call feminism.

Guest

And so their writings are still very applicable to our day.

Guest

And though we're writing, you know, this side of feminism, and so there's some things we might add, you know, particularly to the historical context.

Guest

Their writings are still, you know, extremely helpful and.

Guest

And especially practically.

Guest

Right.

Guest

Because they're.

Guest

They're getting into the Bible and.

Guest

And doing theology.

Guest

So, yeah, I mean, you mentioned examples.

Guest

I mean, I.

Guest

You have, like William Goodge, for example, he wrote a book of domestic duties.

Guest

Goodge was a member of the Westminster assembly that drafted the Westminster confession and catechisms.

Guest

And his book of domestic duties is like a very practical work on the home.

Guest

I mean, it's not just on male headship.

Guest

I mean, it gets in everything, parenting.

Guest

And so it's got.

Guest

It's got instructions for husbands, for wives, and other aspects of the home.

Guest

So it's a very good book.

Guest

It's very popular.

Guest

I think it was 1622 when it came out, and you can find it online today.

Guest

I mean, it's a little older.

Guest

English reformation heritage has republished it as, like, a more modern, modern English.

Guest

But they did.

Guest

They did more than just some spelling corrections.

Guest

So, I mean, I don't love that.

Guest

But overall, it's good.

Guest

They don't change the wording too much.

Guest

But if you want to quote it or something, obviously you can just go look up the original online because it's free.

Guest

But anyway, so, I mean, good even gets into there, like, you know, when he's dealing with husbands and wives, I mean, he's definitely getting into the details of what headship should look like and the marital relationship.

Guest

And so, I mean, he's dealing with situations where, like, you know, he mentions women who don't obey their husbands, you know, don't submit and don't follow their lead.

Guest

And so, I mean, he's got.

Guest

He's got things to say that are, you know, probably somewhat offensive to some people, but that's at least, like, kind of one example in marriage.

Guest

And then you would have.

Guest

I mean, there's other quotes in there.

Guest

I mean, there's just so people know, listeners know.

Guest

The first three chapters of my book are male rule in the home, church and then the Commonwealth.

Guest

So I get into all of those.

Guest

And then I'm looking at the reformed on those different spheres.

Guest

And so, I mean, there's not as much on the church in one sense, because they weren't dealing with like, this push for women pastors, um, like, like we have today.

Guest

But, but they still have, they still have teachings that they applied.

Guest

They applied like, first Timothy two and one corinthians 1434 and 35 and other passages to, to prohibit women from, uh, preaching and leadership in the church.

Guest

So, um, yeah, I mean, there's, there's all sorts of stuff in here we can discuss, but maybe that's enough for, for now.

Will Spencer

Yeah.

Will Spencer

Just to go back to something you said about it, the reformers weren't talking about feminism.

Will Spencer

That wasn't really part of their world, but they were observing some of the same trends, some of the same behaviors, some of the same sins that have now taken shape in a socio political, in even theological kind of posture.

Will Spencer

So it wasn't that they would have described themselves as feminists or anti feminist.

Will Spencer

They didn't know what that was.

Will Spencer

But they had made the same observations that many people are doing today, and they had spoken into these particular issues in their writings.

Will Spencer

And so I guess we can go to the past to find what our forefathers honor thy fathers would have said about some of the same things that we're facing today and apply it to our modern challenges.

Will Spencer

It feels like that's kind of the spirit of the book.

Guest

Yeah, absolutely.

Guest

I mean, the goal of, or like you said, the spirit of the book.

Guest

It's taking the teachings and principles of the older reformed theologians.

Guest

Just to be clear, it's the 16th and 17th century reformers is what I focus on, because that would be the actual reformers, like Calvin.

Guest

I mean, I mentioned Luther a little bit, but it's mostly Calvin, Calvin and Bollinger.

Guest

And I mean, there's others again, too.

Guest

There's more probably the post reformation reformers, reformed orthodox, they've come that are a little bit later that, that's like Goog and Vermigli and others like that.

Guest

So there's.

Guest

Sorry, Vermigli is actually earlier.

Guest

He's a reformer so much, that's, that's another guy.

Guest

He's Dutch.

Will Spencer

I was wondering how to say.

Will Spencer

I was gonna, I was gonna say his name, but I don't know how.

Guest

To say I put in there.

Guest

I think it even has like a f sound.

Guest

Technically, it's like Fuchsius.

Guest

Yeah, fuchsia.

Guest

So, yeah, it's, that's a hard one.

Guest

Gazbertus is his first name.

Guest

So he's a dutch guy, but there's actually not a lot, a lot of his stuff is not translated, so he's somewhat hard to access in English.

Guest

But, um, yeah, I think it's just, you know, it's part of the advantage of going and reading those older theologians is the fact that they're, they're, they don't have the pressure that we do, you know, today, I mean, where we feel like we have to qualify everything or pastors today are afraid to almost even read certain portions of scripture because they're, they're very, you know, patriarchal or whatever.

Guest

I mean, male, they teach male headship and so, you know, they just didn't really fear speaking on those things back in the day.

Guest

I mean, that's not to say we shouldn't be sensitive, you know, to our context and hearers, but I just think it's helpful to go read these older guys and realize, you know, they pretty much all said the same thing with some variation.

Guest

And if that's the case, then that's a pretty good argument that they were right.

Guest

I mean, if you're reformed, right, if you, if you'd like them on, if you like the reformed theologians on justification and, you know, everything else theologically, then we should, we should care what they thought about mail headship and the like.

Will Spencer

Now, were you aware going in of what some of the reformers had said?

Will Spencer

Or was it kind of like a research project?

Will Spencer

Like, did you know where to start?

Will Spencer

Or was it your own kind of journey to go through these men's writings to find out what they had said about these issues?

Guest

I mean, I had a pretty good idea from things I had seen that they were all going to at least hold what we would consider, like traditional teaching regarding male rule, certainly in the home and church.

Guest

And I guess I didn't know exactly what they would all say about the Commonwealth.

Guest

I mean, I had seen some differences between Calvin and Knox that I had even mentioned, I think, in masculine Christianity.

Guest

So I think probably what happened is I had a good idea.

Guest

But as I was researching this book, you know, it's kind of refining things and, you know, understanding even the different nuances, especially on the point between Calvin and Knox.

Guest

And I found other guys who spoke on that question, such as Beza and Bollinger.

Guest

So, yeah, I mean, and even that, I mean, I'll even say now, I mean, the book is nothing.

Guest

It's not exhaustive.

Guest

I mean, there's, there's lots of theologians I don't mention, and you could probably find even more, although I think one of the challenges is trying to find, I mean, there were the reform, the older reformed theologians wrote a lot.

Guest

So, you know, because they didn't do a lot of books directly on the subject.

Guest

It wasn't, you know, major controversy at the time.

Guest

And so sometimes it's hard to find the quotes you have to read through fair amount or skim or know what you're, you know, looking for.

Guest

And so, so, like I said, there is more you could find out there, I'm sure.

Guest

But I tried to, I tried to get at least as much as I could in there.

Guest

I mean, especially, I'm hitting kind of the big names like Calvin and Gooch because he has that of domestical duties, John Knox.

Guest

I mean, he's, he's got the whole book on the trumpet blast against the monstrous regiment of women.

Guest

So I had to get that one in there.

Guest

And then I do get into the reformed confessions a little bit, where I mentioned the Heidelberg catechism on the fifth commandment, but then more so, the Westminster larger catechism, because it has more questions on the fifth commandment.

Guest

It has, like ten of them, I think.

Guest

And so some of that's like, even looking at the, the fifth command is honor your father and mother.

Guest

And so broadly, they understood that to apply to all authority structures.

Guest

So that would include marriage.

Guest

Now, it doesn't always spell that out explicitly in, like, the Westminster large catechism, but if you go look at the language that he uses for the fifth commandment, and then you also look at the verses it's citing, so the proof text, and it's clear that they include marriage in there.

Guest

You know, they'll cite, like, parts of one Peter three, and I know they at least cite that one, but maybe Ephesians five as well.

Guest

And so you can see that when they're citing these texts and then they're using this language that, I mean, I mean, part of the problem is they're speaking of authority structures.

Guest

They're speaking of authority structures in general, like, what should the superior authority do and what should the inferior authority do and the duties and sins.

Guest

And so that's why it's language that would be used both for, like, for superiors, abuse, for husband, but also, like the civil magistrate and parents, even with children.

Guest

But they did include it in there.

Guest

And you can even see that in, like, some expositions of the larger catechism, which I mentioned some of them in there.

Guest

That's just how they, that's how they understood the fifth commandment.

Guest

And so that's just a way.

Guest

I think that's maybe an important thing to mention is that's something we don't often think about today.

Guest

I mean, unfortunately, the church today doesn't even always teach the Ten Commandments, but that was always a big deal back in the day.

Guest

You would learn the Ten Commandments, the Lord's prayer and even catechisms.

Guest

That was common as they would exposit these things, they would go through the Ten Commandments and ask questions, how do we understand this?

Guest

What does this mean, each commandment?

Guest

And then they would do the same with like the different lines of the Lord's prayer.

Guest

And so when you do that, they actually had a whole theology under christian ethics.

Guest

I mean, so that's what this would fall in.

Guest

There was christian ethics.

Guest

But you can see how they under, at least that's the context for how they were teaching on marriage in male headship.

Will Spencer

So they were using the fifth commandment as a way to explain the concept of male headship and authority and submission in the context of the home specifically.

Guest

Yes.

Guest

So that's their primary target.

Guest

There would be the home.

Guest

Now, when you read the reformers, and I have quotes in the book about this, but they, they saw the home as kind of the foundation for then the other spheres of church and state, or Commonwealth, as they would often call it.

Guest

So the language, like William Perkins, I know he used it and maybe Googe as well, where they said that they referred to the family as the seminary of the church and the family as the seminary of the Commonwealth.

Guest

And so the reason is that's like the language of seed is what it's getting at.

Guest

And so they're seeing the family as like the models, the seed of the church.

Guest

And so, I mean, you actually see this even in scripture.

Guest

They're not just making this up.

Guest

You go to like one Timothy three, and you've got Paul.

Guest

He's speaking of elders in the church.

Guest

And one of the requirements is he says that the elder must manage his household.

Guest

Well, that's, I believe, verse four and five and one Timothy three.

Guest

And so he says, if a man doesn't know how to manage his household, how will he care for the church?

Guest

And so you have that very requirement is that the home is a model for the church.

Guest

And so the church is made up of households, it's made up of different families.

Guest

The same is true of the commonwealth.

Guest

And so, I mean, I think this is just the principle is you need to be able to manage your home well.

Guest

And those who do that well and then are called to leadership rule in the church, or teaching in particular, would be like a pastor or teaching elder.

Guest

You know, those men would be called to the eldership.

Guest

They have to be confirmed by the church, of course, so.

Guest

But you have that very practice there, and I think the same would apply to the civil realm, to the commonwealth.

Guest

Now, we don't.

Guest

The Bible doesn't make those demands, but I think that's a reasonable requirement as we look at a civil magistrate.

Guest

He's going to be managing, caring for the citizens.

Guest

I mean, how is he going to rule over other families if his.

Guest

His own family is a mess?

Guest

I think that's a good, good principle.

Guest

Unfortunately, in America, we don't seem to care about that anymore.

Guest

It's kind of gone out the window.

Guest

Most.

Will Spencer

Right.

Guest

You know, most politicians, their families are absolute disasters, so.

Guest

Which maybe explains things with politics, but.

Will Spencer

Amen.

Guest

Yeah, I don't.

Guest

So just to bring it back, that's the idea, is the family is there in the Westminster larger catechism under the fifth commandment, and they're reasoning their way from the family to these other spheres, and they definitely see a connection there.

Will Spencer

I think that does probably explain why we're at.

Will Spencer

Where we're at is that there's been a general devaluing of the family for the past 60 years, generously 100 or more if we want to get really into it.

Will Spencer

And that process has undermined male rule everywhere else.

Will Spencer

You can go back, and again, we're talking about in a context of modern feminism.

Will Spencer

You go back to the 1960s, you see the devaluation.

Will Spencer

In fact, actually, just as a bit of an aside, in my church signal group with all the guys, we're talking about the bear and stain bears now, okay, I'm old enough to remember when they were the Berenstein bears, but that's a whole other conversation.

Will Spencer

But about how those children's books, which I read as a little kid, were actually pretty feminist with the bumbling dad and the mom kind of in charge.

Will Spencer

And of course, I was a little kid, I wasn't paying attention to that.

Will Spencer

But that shows how far back this idea goes.

Will Spencer

You can go into all in the family, the subversion of the male rule, dad is a loudmouth bigot, etcetera.

Will Spencer

So you see these themes that we're all kind of doing in culture, that we're participating in or kind of immersed in to undermine male rule in the home.

Will Spencer

And that has had cascading effects of undermining male rule in the church and then in the state, perhaps at the same time.

Will Spencer

And so the reformers would have looked at it and said, the male rule in the home as established in the fifth commandment is the central ground and the pillar of male rule everywhere else in society.

Will Spencer

Proceeding from the home outwards.

Guest

Yeah, I mean, I think so.

Guest

And when, when the home therefore collapses, I mean, this is a problem.

Guest

It's going to affect everywhere else.

Guest

And so I think, I mean, look, there is an interconnectedness, right?

Guest

Obviously, the church helps support families, right.

Guest

Because they're, they're overseeing them, the elders, they're preaching to families to fulfill their duties.

Guest

And I would say that the state is also supposed to support families.

Guest

I think they don't always do a good job in our culture.

Guest

Right.

Guest

So.

Guest

But some of that would be like.

Will Spencer

Divorce law, the opposite.

Guest

Yeah, yeah, right.

Guest

Like no fault divorce, I mean, actually, I would argue, undermines, well, male headship because the wife could say, well, I don't want to submit to my husband.

Guest

I'm just going to divorce him.

Guest

And the state, there's no punishment.

Guest

There's no, I mean, I pointed this out.

Guest

In masculine Christianity, you know, divorce is, well, marriage is a involves, it's a Christians, we believe it's a covenant.

Guest

I know that Roman Catholics call it a sacrament.

Guest

I don't agree with that.

Guest

It is a covenant.

Will Spencer

But don't worry, they're not here.

Will Spencer

They're not here right now.

Guest

I mean, there could be some listening.

Guest

I don't know.

Guest

But so, yeah, you know, we do believe it's, it's a covenant, but, but legally, it's going to have the, you know, it serves as a contract.

Guest

But, so basically, the way at least I can just speak on us law is, and the states differ in some regard, but they, they have their default laws, default rules for the contract.

Guest

And so you get married, you go sign the marriage license and.

Guest

Yeah, I mean, you can, you can modify it with, you can modify the marriage contract with a prenuptial agreement.

Guest

I mean, that's, that's allowed.

Guest

There's sometimes limitations on it, but you can do that.

Guest

But the problem is, is the default contract is no fault divorce in most states.

Guest

Now, if all states, I think, have it.

Guest

Yeah, New York was like the last one, ironically, it was New York.

Guest

That was the last one.

Guest

Change it.

Guest

Which wasn't that long ago, actually, maybe the last 20 years.

Guest

So, you know, where it used to be required that you would show fault to get a divorce and now you don't have to do that.

Guest

I mean, some states make you wait a little bit longer.

Guest

If you don't, if it's not consensual.

Guest

It's not agreed by both parties.

Guest

But the point being is, unfortunately, the default rules are now either party can unilaterally, unilaterally file for divorce, and there's no punishment.

Guest

There's no.

Guest

Even though they might have breached the contract, they might cheated on their spouse or something, or just they're getting out of the marriage and the other party doesn't want to.

Guest

I mean, that seems like a breach of contract, but there's no penalties.

Guest

It's just judges tend to.

Guest

I mean, there's been some problems here, but judges tend to at least the trend now is they just.

Guest

They don't want to hear anything.

Guest

They just split things 50 50, children, you know, parenting time, and then also finances and the like.

Guest

So that's kind of where we've trained.

Guest

We're training in the United States.

Guest

But the problem is that doesn't support strong families.

Guest

Right.

Guest

We don't have laws in place to actually keep families together.

Guest

We don't have.

Guest

I mean, we have more and more laws that don't protect children.

Guest

I mean, so.

Guest

Oh, that's bad.

Guest

I mean, some of the, you know, transgender laws.

Guest

So there's all sorts of things there.

Guest

And all that is to say, those three spheres of family, church, state, they are all interconnected, and the church and the state are supposed to be supporting the family and supporting.

Guest

Just having strong families.

Guest

And unfortunately, I think we could argue.

Guest

I mean, I've just argued that the state doesn't do a very good job of supporting families, but I think we could also point out a lot of ways that the church is also not supporting strong families.

Guest

Sometimes they.

Guest

I mean, I've seen examples where pastors, sessions, church leadership is allowing one of the parties to divorce, and then they don't.

Guest

They don't penalize them.

Guest

They don't.

Guest

They don't discipline them or bar them from the supper or excommunicate them eventually is what they should do if they don't repent.

Guest

And instead they'll just allow divorce.

Guest

I mean, I've seen.

Guest

I've seen this, and you probably heard of situations like this.

Guest

Well, and so, I mean, this is a problem is, you know, when the state's not doing its job, that's bad enough.

Guest

But the church needs to stand on the scriptures, and they shouldn't just be allowing a party to divorce a Christian to divorce their spouse or a fellow christian spouse is often the case when there's no biblical grounds.

Guest

Right.

Guest

There should be.

Guest

It should be justified in the traditional protestant position.

Guest

I realize some people disagree with this, but the traditional protestant position, which is found in the Westminster standards, is it has to be adultery or abandonment.

Guest

And so anyway, all that is to say, I mean, and this is just in the divorce issue, there's also other things.

Guest

The church isn't always preaching male headship.

Guest

It's not always preaching.

Guest

Pastors aren't always preaching for wives to submit to their husbands.

Guest

And so they're almost like, you know, they may.

Guest

They may give lip service to male headship, but then they're essentially encouraging egalitarian practice, which is contrary to God's design.

Guest

And then, of course, so what you end up with is that causes problems.

Guest

And so in that way, the church, and often many churches, unfortunately today, are just straight up egalitarian and teaching egalitarianism.

Guest

So all of that undermines the family.

Guest

And so the family is kind of left often on it on its own.

Guest

I mean, there's some good churches doing a good job here, but the family's often left like, it's just up to husband and wife, and hopefully they do a good job.

Guest

And if they don't, things fall apart, and then the church might not, might or might not help them, and the state probably isn't going to help them at all.

Guest

So all that is to say is that this three spheres should be working together.

Guest

The family is foundational, but we basically have the disintegration of the family.

Guest

I mean, there's lots of people that talk about this, right?

Guest

That the family's kind of falling apart.

Guest

The american family, at least we can say, is rather weak, but then that ends up affecting church and state.

Guest

So it's kind of this, you know, it's reciprocal in the sense that, okay, the state and the church harm the family.

Guest

The family breaks down, but then that ends up leading to a weaker church and a weaker state, because those people go into politics or church leadership, or there's a lack of church leadership.

Guest

Right.

Guest

You know, suitable candidates.

Guest

So anyway, that was kind of a long answer, but all of that kind of goes hand in hand.

Will Spencer

Yeah, the pieces all fit together.

Will Spencer

That answer is great.

Will Spencer

I mean, I think a lot of people listening can see these things reflected in their own lives.

Will Spencer

You can see that the male rule in the home, the value of the family and marriage itself, and even human life and abortion has been undermined.

Will Spencer

And what we have now, which many men that I know have been experiencing, is they have the divorce industry, the meat grinder that just grinds men down, that enables women to claim, without justification, things like abuse and to deprive dads of their children.

Will Spencer

That's a whole big thing.

Will Spencer

I know that David Edgington talks about the abusive wife he's having a lot of men flocking to him who have been sharing their stories of the ways that they've been actually impacted by the way that the family court system has been weaponized against men.

Will Spencer

And I think the frustrating thing is all of those things can be true, and they're terrible for what they are, but that the church seems to turn a blind eye to all of it.

Will Spencer

You know, I know a man, he was married for 20 years, had, I think, three sons, four sons with his wife.

Will Spencer

They were married, and she decided that she was just going to peace out of the faith.

Will Spencer

She's done with this whole Christianity thing, you know, dropped a.

Will Spencer

Dropped a surprise divorce on her husband, you know, and instantly, she gets half, you know, and actually ends up being closer to 60%.

Will Spencer

And his church didn't do anything about it, and she just decides she's going to go to another church that's just going to be like, oh, yeah, that's cool.

Will Spencer

Yeah, sure.

Will Spencer

You just destroyed your family for no reason at all because you decided you didn't want to submit to your husband anymore and how common this is and how the church is supposed to be the backstop for this.

Will Spencer

It's supposed to be far more than that.

Will Spencer

But I think men have a right to expect that a patriarchal religion, very obviously, if you read scripture like, Christianity, would speak up for them.

Will Spencer

I mean, obviously, hold them accountable for sin.

Will Spencer

Don't give them carte blanche to sin themselves.

Will Spencer

That's not what I mean.

Will Spencer

But to say that, like, hey, this is what the book says, and you're a minister of the word.

Will Spencer

What's going on?

Will Spencer

And they just kind of, like, shrug their shoulders and like, well, you know, and it's frustrating for men who feel like their own churches should be standing up for them and simply aren't.

Guest

Yeah, well, I'm frustrated by it, and I'm a minister myself, but, I mean, there are exceptions out there.

Guest

Obviously.

Guest

There are good pastors.

Guest

There are good churches.

Guest

But, yeah, I think this is a huge problem.

Guest

And, I mean, some of this is unavoidable in the sense of we have different denominations, we have a lot of independent churches, and people could.

Guest

People can either be deceitful, like, they can just.

Guest

They could get excommunicated at their church.

Guest

They can go to another church and just not mention it.

Guest

I mean, that's possible.

Guest

Or more likely, though.

Guest

And the unfortunate thing is that more likely that that church just doesn't care.

Guest

You know, they just, they don't care that another church excommunicated them.

Guest

They don't even know, like excommunication.

Guest

Well, we never do that.

Will Spencer

Oh my goodness.

Guest

Right.

Guest

So, I mean, this happens, unfortunately, is there's, so if we were to identify the problem, it's, there's a lack of discipline in the church.

Guest

And I mean, this, I mean, discipline starts with the preaching of the word.

Guest

So you have to have faithful preaching because the idea is, right, you're calling people to repentance on a regular basis to obedience to God.

Guest

And so that should be, that's kind of your like first line of defense.

Guest

But when people don't do that and then they commit flagrant sins, right.

Guest

It's the public stuff or scandalous sinse.

Guest

And then they need to be censured, they need to be rebuked, you know, by, I mean, we have this in like Matthew 18, right?

Guest

You go, if somebody sins against you, your brother, you go talk to him and rebuke him.

Guest

If he doesn't listen, you go to two or, you know, bring two or three, and then if he doesn't listen, that you go, you take it to the church.

Guest

And so the church would be going to the session.

Guest

You go to your church leadership.

Guest

I mean, Presbyterians, we call it sessions the elders.

Guest

But whatever your church leadership is, and they should, they should be taking up discipline against the person.

Guest

I mean, they could start with just talking to the person about it, but when the person refuses, then they can go through their courts.

Guest

We have church courts.

Guest

Maybe people don't always realize this, but at least, like the Presbyterians is how we do things.

Guest

We have ecclesiastical courts, and so we can do censures, we can charge the person with an offense.

Guest

And so let's say, you know, it could be like abandonment, right?

Guest

They're divorcing their spouse.

Guest

We would say, well, that's, you're abandoning your spouse.

Guest

You don't have warrant to do that, assuming there's no warrant.

Guest

And so, you know, the church should be bringing discipline, and that would start with rebuke, and then it would move to suspension from the sacraments.

Guest

Right.

Guest

You know, you don't go to excommunication right away.

Guest

You're trying to be patient with people to repent of.

Guest

Yeah, but eventually, if they're refusing to repent, contumacious is the word that's sometimes used, contumacy.

Guest

They refuse to repent.

Guest

They're hardened in their sin.

Guest

Then you excommunicate them.

Guest

And that's just right.

Guest

We see that in the Bible.

Guest

I mean, this principle is there like one corinthians five, at least amongst other places, you deliver them to Satan.

Guest

I mean, the hope is they repent.

Guest

But that's actually part of the discipline process is you have to cast them out of the church and say your sin is unacceptable, it's unbecoming of a Christian.

Guest

You can't do it and remain a part of the church.

Guest

And so we visibly, as part of the visible church, you are no longer communicating with us.

Guest

Communicating, you're excommunicated.

Guest

So all that is to say there should be a discipline in the church.

Guest

And especially for things like unjustified divorce, that would be called abandonment.

Guest

I mean, and this, this isn't limited to women, right?

Guest

It would apply to men or women doing the same, a man or woman doing the same thing or, you know, committing adultery or whatever sin it is, whatever flagrant sin there is taking place, there should be discipline against it.

Guest

It just seems, though, that there's, I mean, I've seen this in some cases, I mean, it's a small sample size, so I can't, I can't extrapolate it everywhere.

Guest

But I, from talking to other people, it does seem to be that this is primarily a problem with women because I do think it's more common if a man was to, a christian man is to just leaves his wife.

Guest

The church is going to, you know, more likely than not to lay down the hammer.

Guest

But when a woman does it, they can, they can, I don't know, they sometimes justify it or they have some basis as well.

Guest

You know, she said that her husband was abusive.

Guest

Okay, well, was this physical abuse?

Guest

Did she call the police?

Guest

I mean, when those things aren't, aren't the case, which, you know, that's usually not the case when this is going on.

Guest

I mean, if the police are involved, that's a different story.

Guest

But when we're just saying like spiritual abuse or this loose definition, and then they kind of let it go.

Guest

Right?

Guest

That's, that seems to be the case, is there's this practice where the churches are just, they're like overlooking things because, well, the wife, you know, gives some basis for why she's doing what she's doing.

Guest

And a lot of times it's like emotionally manipulative, really.

Guest

I mean, that the pastors and elders are being manipulated by women.

Guest

So this is really, I mean, messed up, right?

Guest

I mean, it shouldn't be working this way.

Guest

Yeah.

Guest

The pastors and elders should be objective.

Guest

Neutral arbiters in these, in these things.

Guest

And so it should be fair, you know, whether it's the husband or wife that's abandoning the spouse, they should, they should be put under discipline.

Guest

So this seems to be, from what I understand, talking to others as well, seems to be there's this particular problem with women doing this.

Guest

Christian women, some of them maybe leave the faith, but sometimes they just are just going to a different church or whatever, or they stay at the same church.

Guest

I mean, kind of crazy.

Guest

And the pastors don't do anything.

Guest

Elders don't do anything.

Guest

But so that raises the question, though, you know, what are we to make of churches that aren't disciplining people for flagrant sins like obvious sins?

Guest

Right.

Guest

Well, I mean, you look at the reformers and that the reform, the reformed tradition, the protestant tradition, you know, they ask, well, what are the marks of a church?

Guest

Well, the marks are, you know, the faithful preaching of the word and the right administration of the sacraments.

Guest

And then sometimes you hear the third one, which is the proper administration, discipline.

Guest

But really, the thing is, you know, if you, you don't even necessarily need to name that one because that falls under the sacrament.

Guest

Right?

Guest

If we just say baptism and, sorry, the preaching of the word.

Guest

The right preaching of the word.

Guest

Right.

Guest

Administration of sacraments.

Guest

If you're rightly administering the sacraments, then if someone's in open flagrant sin, then you should not be administering the sacraments to them.

Guest

You should be suspending them and then eventually excommunicating them from the sacraments.

Guest

And that's the very language of excommunication.

Guest

Right?

Guest

Communion of the Lord's supper.

Guest

So here's the really concerning part, is if a church is not properly or rightly administering the sacraments, then they are actually, they're not meeting one of the two marks of the church, which would mean that they're actually a false church.

Guest

And so that's, I mean, this is a serious problem.

Guest

And you see this in like, scripture uses the language of like, synagogues, of satan.

Guest

You know, you have, you have actual, like false churches.

Guest

We know there's false churches.

Guest

I mean, the protestant consensus has been that Rome is a false church because they distort the gospel and their idolatry with the mass.

Guest

It's because they don't rightly administer the sacrament.

Guest

So if we're going to say that about Rome is, well, they get the sacraments so wrong that they're actually in the gospel, they're a false church.

Guest

I mean, what does that say about kind of modern evangelicalism.

Guest

I think you have a lot of false churches within the, within evangelicalism today.

Guest

I mean, I'm not gonna, I can't know on an individual basis, but I'm just saying like, I think that's pretty obvious.

Guest

If we have churches that are either distorting the gospel or it doesn't have to be that they could be preaching justification by faith or something, but then they turn around and they're not doing any church discipline for flagrant sins.

Guest

Then according to the traditional reform position, I think we say traditional protestant position, they're actually a false church.

Will Spencer

That's right.

Will Spencer

That's right.

Will Spencer

I want to flip to the back of the book.

Will Spencer

You probably would remember the quote faster than I would be able to find it.

Will Spencer

But you make the point that what good is it to have reformed all these different aspects of the church if we're not reforming our impact on culture?

Will Spencer

And that seems to be the most striking aspect of the book, is like, okay, reformed our soteriology and all of, and that's, and then praise God.

Will Spencer

And you know, there is a particular blind spot that we have in our culture today.

Will Spencer

And when I've had these conversations with many women, they will say very rightly that there have been situations of church abuse which I think we could probably rightly and truly call abuse.

Will Spencer

But I think the response that the church has had a, is rather than saying, okay, we're not going to do that anymore and we're going to hold a bolt.

Will Spencer

We're going to hold both to a standard.

Will Spencer

They've just kind of said, you know what we're going to do instead?

Will Spencer

We're going to hold both men and women to a low standard or a no standard to make up for past excesses.

Will Spencer

And that seems to be, seems to have created a particular blind spot where, okay, long before I was born, there was probably abuses happening in church that probably still are today.

Will Spencer

But the existence of those abuses or those excesses does not itself justify overlooking excesses on the other side.

Will Spencer

And that, I think, is the unique aspect of our moment is that, okay, we have to make up for those other abuses by being blind to a completely different category of abuse.

Will Spencer

And somehow these scales will even out.

Will Spencer

And I just don't, I mean, I don't think that that washes, but that seems to be the posture that many churches have like, well, the christian church screwed up in all these other ways in the past.

Will Spencer

So now we're just going to let everyone have kind of a free for all, but it's actually serving to make things worse?

Guest

Yeah, I mean, that makes no sense on really any level.

Guest

Because.

Guest

Because, I mean, if you're practicing injustice now, then on what basis could you even say prior generations were practicing injustice or abuse?

Guest

You know, practicing abuse?

Guest

So it's a.

Guest

That's just kind of crazy, is.

Guest

I mean, I would challenge the idea that there was widespread abuse in marriage and the like, prior to the feminist movement or something.

Guest

I wouldn't agree with that.

Guest

But, like, even if we were to grant that, well, then the solution would be we should just seek to follow God's word properly now, and I.

Guest

And follow just practices.

Guest

So, yeah, this idea of justifying injustice because of past abuses is.

Guest

Well, it's actually just unjust.

Guest

So there's really no other way.

Guest

Other way to put it.

Will Spencer

So, yeah, it's just unjust in the opposite.

Will Spencer

It's unjust in the opposite direction.

Will Spencer

And that seems to be the whole thrust of wokeness.

Will Spencer

Just in general, this straw man is built of excesses and abuses in the past.

Will Spencer

And so in order to right those excesses, we allow them in the opposite direction.

Will Spencer

And that's not justice at all.

Will Spencer

But that seems to soothe, not in any good way, a particular longing, perhaps, for revenge.

Will Spencer

And I think that's the spirit that underlies a lot of this.

Will Spencer

And I can understand, not to excuse it, but I can understand how people in the secular world would think that way.

Will Spencer

I can understand the victor victim kind of cycle, which might be one of the only things ever to come out of psychology that's any good, is to understand the ways that victors become the victims.

Will Spencer

And that cycle goes around and around.

Will Spencer

But within the christian church, that that seems to have been swallowed and digested from self professing christians is something that's quite odd.

Will Spencer

This idea that we have to welcome in the marginalized and give them power to then exert their own agenda, and somehow that writes the scales of history.

Will Spencer

I think that's anti biblical.

Will Spencer

There's an objective standard that we're all accountable to, but it's something that has flowed in probably through the very same feminist doors that you articulate, opened and opened in this book, and probably through theological liberalism as well.

Guest

Yeah, I mean, even when you look at, like, feminism, they're not advocating actual equality.

Guest

I mean, I would reject what they're wanting anyway, which would be functional equality.

Guest

And, I mean, scripture doesn't teach that actually teaches that the husband has authority.

Guest

I mean, while it affirms equality and being right and worse between men and women.

Guest

So.

Guest

But, yeah, I mean, you see that now is.

Guest

It's.

Guest

I mean, feminism wants essentially female dominance.

Guest

I think that's often the case.

Will Spencer

So, yeah, yeah.

Will Spencer

Just real quick, I want to get back into the book.

Will Spencer

A couple more questions.

Will Spencer

But one of the things I wanted to mention is there was a thread going around on Twitter about female toxic femininity, and could someone please provide examples of toxic femininity?

Will Spencer

And so I replied to that, and somewhere down the thread, I was able to say, well, when we look at the examples of male heroes, the component of male heroism is never like, haha, I won over the women.

Will Spencer

But when you look at female heroes and media today, one of their components is always like, I put down those silly men.

Will Spencer

And so you can see in that there is an element of this isn't just about equality, it's actually about supremacy.

Guest

Yeah, absolutely.

Guest

I see that same thing.

Will Spencer

It's hard to miss, and it's becoming, I don't know that it's actually popular, but it's trendy, let's say.

Will Spencer

So to get back into the book, one of the things that you did, I kind of see the book as being divided into three sections.

Will Spencer

In a way.

Will Spencer

You have the reformers within the home, and then you kind of bring it into the commonwealth, as you said.

Will Spencer

But then you also talk a little bit about where things are in the evangelical church and some of the particular leaders, in particular Tim Keller and his wife, who have maybe they played a central role in letting some of these ideas in.

Will Spencer

And I found that to be the most shocking part of the book.

Will Spencer

But before we get there, I want to talk a little bit about female rule in the commonwealth, because you mentioned the difference between Calvin and Knox, which I thought was really interesting.

Will Spencer

Maybe we can talk a little bit about that for the moment, because we've talked about in the home.

Will Spencer

And so now let's bring it into the commonwealth, and then we'll take a look at what's going on in the church.

Guest

Yeah, so, I mean, Knox has his.

Guest

I mentioned this earlier, the first trumpet blast against the monstrous regiment of women.

Guest

And he writes this.

Guest

He actually writes it anonymously at first.

Guest

And this is against Bloody Mary because she's queen and she's Roman Catholic, but she's persecuting Protestants.

Guest

She's killing Protestants.

Guest

And so, I mean, hence the name she earned, bloody Maryland.

Guest

But when Knox writes his short treatise, he doesn't just attack her.

Guest

And he doesn't just say, well, women generally shouldn't rule.

Guest

He actually says that female rule is illegitimate.

Guest

He attacks it entirely.

Guest

He's attacking just the idea of women rulers at all.

Guest

Now, this becomes a problem because Mary dies, and then Elizabeth comes to power, and she's a Protestant.

Guest

So, I mean, I think Mary was only alive for, like, four years.

Guest

I think that's right.

Guest

Queen for four years.

Guest

So that's kind of the context of what happened there.

Guest

And Elizabeth is not happy with John Knox.

Guest

I mean, Knox is scottish, but that was under the monarchy at the time.

Guest

So Calvin was not happy about Knox's treatise, the first blast, because he actually writes, and I have it in there, basically, Knox had asked him once, like, in private about this issue, and Calvin didn't see what Knox wrote immediately.

Guest

But once he finds out about it, he was not happy.

Guest

And partly because it's not that he did disagree with Knox in part, and I'll explain that.

Guest

But the bigger issue, I think, was Knox caused trouble for basically the reformers because I think it was published in Geneva.

Guest

And so Queen Elizabeth was upset.

Guest

I.

Guest

She was upset with Calvin and Beza, and they, of course, aren't pleased with this situation.

Guest

So though they weren't, they weren't in England, but just relations with England.

Guest

So all that is to say Calvin, and you see this in letters between him and also Bollinger and Beza, those guys all said that female rule should not be ordinary.

Guest

So they weren't, you know, happy about having queens.

Guest

They didn't think it was this great thing.

Guest

They just didn't think it was illegitimate.

Guest

So they didn't go as far as Knox.

Guest

But, you know, you can see this in, like, Calvin's.

Guest

I mean, you could just.

Guest

I have it in there, but you can go read, like, his commentary on one Timothy two.

Guest

And he actually applies that, you know, prohibition on women teaching in the church.

Guest

He applies that to Commonwealth.

Guest

And he just says, like, you know, the female power rule has always been considered a monstrous thing.

Guest

So, I mean, he's got even pretty strong language against this as well.

Guest

So that's why I say, like, his view isn't that different from Calvin.

Guest

It's not like he thought women rulers were good.

Guest

I mean, all of these guys, if they were looking at our society today, would say, yeah, something's really out of whack.

Guest

I mean, you know, you're pushing 50% or even, like, higher.

Guest

You know, majorities of your leaders are women.

Guest

That's.

Guest

That's not just some, like, Deborah situation where there's, like, you know, where she was a judge.

Guest

I mean, I qualify that some.

Guest

I get in that some of the differences there in masculine Christianity with her.

Guest

But, yes, but, you know, we can at least grant.

Guest

Okay, there's occasional female rulers.

Guest

You know, that's.

Guest

That's.

Guest

It happens sometimes.

Guest

They do a decent job, but that's not the issue.

Guest

The question is, what's God's design for leadership?

Guest

Should women be leading?

Guest

And I think the traditional reform position, consensus, the minimum, at least, is that, well, it shouldn't be ordinary.

Guest

Just as men are the leaders in the home and definitely are leaders in the church, in the civil realm, they should ordinarily.

Guest

Should ordinarily be men.

Guest

But.

Guest

But sometimes things did happen right, where, you know, you would have a queen.

Guest

I mean, they weren't.

Guest

We have to remember, like, they weren't.

Guest

They weren't elected.

Guest

It's because there was, you know, the queen's married to the king, or there's no.

Guest

There's no male heir.

Guest

I mean, sometimes that was part of the problem.

Guest

So.

Guest

So anyway, so a little different situation.

Guest

It wasn't, you know, a democracy or something where they're electing female.

Guest

Female leaders.

Will Spencer

So was John Knox's book, was that inspired by Mary's brutality, or was it a posture that he had already held?

Will Spencer

Was it, like, I have to write this now, and to assert that female leaders are unjust because she's persecuting Protestants?

Will Spencer

Or was this just something that he already believed that the circumstances gave him the opportunity to write?

Guest

I don't know how much he knew or thought about women leaders before he wrote that, but I think it's fair to say he probably thought what he thought before he wrote it, but he decided, well, Mary, she's awful, and I need to blast her.

Guest

And so that's what he did.

Guest

And I think it's just, that's where his theology came out.

Will Spencer

Okay.

Will Spencer

So it gave him sort of an urgency in his occasion to express this, and so that's to be distinguished from men like Calvin and like Luther that thought that there were extraordinary circumstances where women could lead in the commonwealth, but it certainly wasn't ordinary.

Will Spencer

It wasn't to be sought, it wasn't to be celebrated.

Will Spencer

It was perhaps remedial versus.

Will Spencer

John Knox was like, no, never, under any circumstances.

Guest

Yeah, he said, it's illegitimate.

Guest

Yeah.

Guest

So he went.

Guest

He went a step further.

Guest

Yeah.

Will Spencer

But, I mean, I guess that makes a little sense.

Will Spencer

That makes sense given the circumstances.

Will Spencer

So, as you were investigating the reformers, I meant to ask you this a little bit earlier.

Will Spencer

Did you find anything that these men said about these ideas that surprised you?

Will Spencer

They were like, oh, like a particular clarity that was relevant to today or anything that was like, oh, I wouldn't have expected they thought this way about it.

Guest

Yeah, that's a good question.

Guest

I, I mean, I guess at least maybe just how well they address the issues.

Guest

I think, I think they really have good counsel.

Guest

I mean, just even the words, I mean, I don't know.

Guest

You know, look, the older writers are always going to get accused by modern standards of being sexist, but you go, you go read, you go read them.

Guest

And, you know, they obviously thought highly of women.

Guest

They weren't trying to keep women down.

Guest

I mean, so none that surprises me.

Guest

But to see it drawn out, you know, it's pretty standard to, like, speak of a husband's wife as his counselor, advisor and those kind of things.

Guest

So, you know, I don't really know how you would, the, the feminists would fit that with their paradigm because they weren't saying like, oh, yeah, we don't care what women think.

Guest

You shouldn't even ask them their opinions.

Guest

No, that's not how they approach things.

Guest

They just thought, well, the husband's the head of his household and so he had ultimate responsibility and duties.

Guest

But, yeah, I mean, they're, they're, they affirm, like, equality between men and women in a sense.

Guest

Right.

Guest

I mean, which we would all do is, I mean, they even use this language of, and there was that Matthew Henry quotes it, but it was from some earlier theologians where they say Eve was not taken from Adam's head or feet, but from his heart.

Guest

Right.

Guest

So he doesn't trample her, but, but she, you know, there's a nearness in equality with her.

Guest

So, you know, they say things like that.

Guest

It's pretty standard.

Guest

So, I mean, yeah, I think feminists, you know, would probably be tripped up by some of this stuff if they actually read it.

Will Spencer

Can't be bothered.

Will Spencer

Yeah, I thought the consistency, I think the number, the number of times that you, that, that different reformers quoted that same sentiment, that she wasn't taken from Adam's head to rule over him or from his feet to be trampled under him, but from his side to be next to him.

Will Spencer

There were at least three or four different reformers who said the same thing.

Will Spencer

Maybe they all got it from one of their predecessors.

Will Spencer

But I thought that was a very beautiful and moving sentiment that speaks exactly to the, like, look, headship is a thing, but headship and submission doesn't mean subjugation.

Will Spencer

And that's, of course, the feminists jump right into the, this is all about subjugation.

Will Spencer

Ditch and overlook the notion that this is supposed to be a loving bond of equality in one sense, but leadership in another sense.

Will Spencer

And how much Holmes need that?

Will Spencer

Because I don't think that they could make the case that our leaderless homes today are doing better than they ever have at any point in history.

Will Spencer

The joke that I've been making is that real feminism has never been tried, of course.

Will Spencer

But maybe if they investigated the reformers, as you did, they would see, particularly in the church, that this is a far more loving bond than perhaps they want to interpret it as.

Guest

Yeah, absolutely.

Guest

I mean, we've got that quote about you being taken from the rib, but also just the duties.

Guest

Well, scriptural duties from the Lord.

Guest

But they preach these to men and women.

Guest

And so, I mean, they.

Guest

Have.

Guest

You read Goodge, for example, William Goodge.

Guest

I mean, he's got hard words for wives, but he also has hard words for husbands and being gentle with their wives.

Guest

And it's one, Peter, three.

Guest

So, yeah, I mean, it's just.

Guest

It's all balanced.

Guest

They're just wise, and it's good, good application from scripture.

Guest

And I think, really, anybody would benefit from, you know, reading the quotations I provide in the book.

Guest

But then you can also use that to jump off and go read, you know, the original sources.

Guest

If you'd like to read more.

Guest

I mean, like I said, you could googe.

Guest

And, yeah, I think, you know, just when we contrast.

Guest

When we contrast, like, older culture, christian culture, compared to, like, what we have today, I mean, okay, everybody, every culture has always had problems.

Guest

There's always been divorce and adultery and all these, you know, sins.

Guest

But, you know, who had a.

Guest

Who had healthier marriages?

Guest

I mean, we have some very healthy marriages today.

Guest

But, like, overall, I mean, you look at our divorce rates and all these things.

Guest

I mean, I don't know when you have a nation where, like, 40% of the children are born outside of marriage.

Guest

I mean, and then the divorce rates.

Guest

I don't even know what the divorce rate is.

Guest

It's just high.

Guest

I know that.

Guest

I don't know.

Guest

I don't know how you say that.

Guest

Well, we've got a better grasp on marriage today.

Guest

No, no, we don't.

Will Spencer

I'm sorry.

Guest

Just don't.

Will Spencer

You mentioned Guj, and so I marked this page.

Will Spencer

It's sort of an extended quote, if I may.

Will Spencer

Read it real quick.

Will Spencer

Good recognizes on page, I think it says, this is 25.

Will Spencer

Goodge recognized that some wives must have their own will and must command not only children and her servants, but husbands also, he added, quote, if a husband be a man of courageous and seek to stand upon his right and maintain his authority by requiring obedience of his wife.

Will Spencer

Strange it is to behold what a hurly burly she will make in the house.

Will Spencer

But if he be a milksop and basely yield unto his wife and suffer her to rule, then it may be those there shall be some outward quiet.

Will Spencer

The ground of hereof is an ambitious and proud humor in women who must needs rule, or else they think themselves slaves.

Will Spencer

And I thought that was a pretty powerful picture in a way.

Will Spencer

In some sense, the things that the reformers are dealing with.

Will Spencer

Sin is not new.

Zach Garris

It's not a new invention.

Will Spencer

And to look into the past and to see, I mentioned earlier, David Edgington and the abusive wife.

Will Spencer

So many men in his book and his practice, they try to lead righteously, and the response is to have a big hurly burly made about it, as if it's slavery.

Will Spencer

It's like, well, no, that's not the case at all, as we've been saying.

Guest

Yeah, I'll continue to quote for you because it gets even more controversial.

Will Spencer

Please.

Guest

He says, but in doing so, the women who react this way, he says, assuredly herein, they thwart God's ordinance, pervert the order of nature, deface the image of Christ, overthrow the ground of all duty, hinder the good of the family, become an ill pattern to children and servants, lay themselves open to Satan and incur many other mischiefs which cannot but follow upon the violating of this main duty of obedience, which, if it be not performed, how can other duties be expected?

Guest

So that's kind of where I was saying, you know, Gooch has some.

Guest

Some strong words for people, but in this case, he's.

Guest

That's the feminist spirit.

Guest

He's.

Guest

He's saying, you know, this is.

Guest

This is just what God calls you to do.

Guest

And if you don't obey God in this matter, if wives won't submit to their husbands, on what basis are they going to do, you know, other.

Guest

Fulfill other duties and.

Guest

And practice other christian virtues?

Guest

So, I mean, that's why this stuff matters, right?

Guest

I mean, the Bible's pretty clear on male headship, wifely submission, and it's just as clear as that you should, you know, practice patience and be loving and these kind of things.

Guest

So, I mean, if I don't know how we can just divide things and throw.

Guest

I mean, obviously, I'm familiar with egalitarian arguments.

Guest

I tried to dismantle them in masculine Christianity, but, you know, I just.

Guest

If you're gonna throw one out, you're probably throwing other things out.

Will Spencer

So that's a great opportunity to segue into the third, I was gonna say the third half of the book, but really the third section of the book, which is about the Kellers and Nancy Pearcey's toxic war on masculinity.

Will Spencer

So maybe we can talk a little bit about that, because you had mentioned jokingly, I don't know how they make.

Will Spencer

How they square these two things.

Will Spencer

It's like, well, here are some pretty significant leaders who identify themselves with the reformed tradition, who have been doing just that.

Will Spencer

Like the section about the Kellers, I was like, I couldn't read.

Will Spencer

My hand was over my face.

Will Spencer

Like, what am I watching right now with some of the things that were being written there?

Will Spencer

So let's talk about that, because that was, of course, we're having this conversation a couple days after Ray Ortland had tweeted about his support for Kamala Harris and never Trump.

Will Spencer

And, of course, we all have misinterpreted that.

Will Spencer

Obviously.

Will Spencer

Obviously, we had misinterpreted a six word tweet, but it's up right now.

Will Spencer

So maybe we can talk a bit about that last section.

Guest

Yeah, absolutely.

Guest

I mean, we can maybe just preface this by saying that, you know, many of the leaders in the church have done a poor job in, well, a variety of areas, but feminism being one of them, or male.

Guest

Male headship, I think I spend, like, 15 pages on the Kellers, you know, which is unfortunate.

Guest

I mean, Tim Keller was, you know, he passed away last year.

Guest

I mean, he's been very influential in the PCA, my denomination.

Guest

I'm some same denomination he was.

Guest

And just even outside of, really, even the reformed world.

Guest

And Tim Keller's gotten a lot of criticism for a number of things, but I haven't seen a lot of criticism on this issue.

Guest

In fact, I've seen some people praise his wife's booklet, which I get into in there, which is Jesus justice and gender roles.

Guest

It's very short, published by Sondervin, so that maybe will tell you where it's coming from, which, you know, Sonderin's not very conservative, not anymore.

Guest

So, yeah, I mean, you can ask me specific things in here, but I think, yeah, the Kellers were very narrow.

Guest

They held to a very narrow complementarianism.

Guest

In fact, I wouldn't even.

Guest

I mean, I don't love the term complementarianism for various reasons, one of which is that, you know, that that would put their view in the same camp broadly as, I mean, maybe mine, if you wanted to call me a complementarian.

Guest

I mean, I like.

Guest

I said, I generally don't like that term.

Guest

But you've had that distinction between, like, broader and narrow complementarianism.

Guest

But yeah, I mean, they're almost at, like, egalitarianism.

Guest

But yeah.

Guest

Go ahead.

Will Spencer

Well, so for the listeners who don't know the difference between broad and narrow complementarianism, maybe to even contrast it with egalitarianism and patriarchy help because those two terms in particular, like, what do they mean in the context of this discussion?

Guest

Yeah.

Guest

Well, let's start with, like, the traditional reform view, which is what I'm advocating.

Guest

The book, which some people would call patriarchy, just male rule.

Guest

It's God designed mental rule.

Guest

And so that would be in the home, church and Commonwealth.

Guest

That would fit some complementarians who would say they are broad complementarians.

Guest

But maybe what will help explain that is the narrow complementarians, where they.

Guest

I don't know if they use this term for themselves, but it got used for them, which is that, I mean, to be a complementarian, you had to affirm.

Guest

This was in the 1980s, then into 1990s, you had this rise of the complementarian movement.

Guest

It was really a reaction against egalitarianism or christian feminism, which was denying male headship, you know, at all.

Guest

In the home or church, they wanted women pastors and mutual, mutual submission, they call it in the home.

Guest

It's kind of crazy.

Guest

So complementarianism came in and said, no, no, no, we affirm male leadership in the home.

Guest

We affirm, you know, only.

Guest

Only men can be pastors and elders in the church.

Guest

And that's good.

Guest

Those are good things to affirm.

Guest

But the problem is how that got played out, how these things were applied and then kind of some compromise in between.

Guest

So, for example, some people calling themselves complementarians, they wouldn't let women hold the office of pastor elder, but they would let women.

Guest

I mean, you have this actually a lot.

Guest

There's a lot of guys who do.

Guest

They still let women teach Sunday school.

Guest

You know, they can.

Guest

Well, they can teach men in other settings.

Guest

Okay.

Guest

But.

Guest

But, you know, some of them, the worst offenders would say, well, women can actually preach as long as it's under the authority of the session.

Guest

Right.

Guest

Because they can't be the pastor, but they can preach.

Guest

I mean, no, I don't think that makes any sense, but.

Guest

And I have various reasons for it with some of which I get into the book.

Guest

But, you know, I'll just mention one here is like, first Timothy two says, I do not permit a woman to teach or exercise authority over man.

Guest

So the prohibition is on teaching.

Guest

It's not even limited to preaching, and it's not on the office.

Guest

So you have a broad prohibition that women aren't to teach scripture to men.

Guest

And I argue that that's like a public aspect, not a one on one conversation or something.

Guest

So anyway, so I don't think it makes sense.

Guest

But that's the narrow complementarian position.

Guest

Now, the Kellers never said that they allowed, that they would allow women to preach, but I don't think they really put the brakes on that.

Guest

In other words, I think the very things that they said in that Cathy Keller's booklet argues, I think it would allow that for that position, though they didn't say that that's what they held.

Guest

But I do know.

Guest

I mean, and I dug this up, and I have footnotes on it, so if people want to see my research, they can find it.

Guest

It's all backed up for Timothy Keller, I had to find stuff that was, like, audio.

Guest

You know, it's.

Guest

He didn't write a whole lot on this.

Guest

His wife has that booklet.

Guest

But I mean, basically, I can just tell you they agreed.

Guest

He clearly was fine with everything she wrote in that booklet, and.

Guest

Which, which would make sense.

Guest

So basically, he allowed women to teach theology courses in their church to Mendez.

Guest

Mixed groups, even.

Guest

I think they had one exception.

Guest

He said it's like, not their, like, I think they call it, like, catechet humans class.

Guest

So basically, they're new members, but, yeah, so that meant, like, in Keller's church, which is redeemer, New York, they.

Guest

And I assume they're still doing this.

Guest

They were allowing women to teach.

Guest

They did a systematic theology course, or, I don't know, you're just going through the old testament or whatever in some Sunday school course, they got women teaching that.

Guest

So, I mean, that seems fairly egalitarian, but so, so that's the thing is, like, the narrow complementarian position is kind of like this compromise of sorts.

Guest

It's like a middle.

Guest

I mean, it's kind of Tim Keller's thing is the third way ism.

Guest

But, yeah, so that's.

Guest

That's where they were.

Guest

And I will mention you've seen my prediction here is people that really followed Keller on these things will.

Guest

Will continue to go down a bad path.

Guest

I think narrow complementarianism is very unstable.

Guest

I mean, there's other issues we didn't get into, but, like, they don't tend to really tie the prohibition with nature, the difference between men and women.

Guest

And so they kind of make the prohibitions to be, like, arbitrary.

Guest

And so then if they're just arbitrary, then you don't really have a good reason.

Guest

I mean, you have, you have God's command.

Guest

I mean, that's a good enough reason.

Guest

Follow it.

Guest

But it does help when we understand why he said what he did, why he placed prohibitions on us, which is.

Guest

Oh, well, he designed men to lead, and men are more suited for preaching and leadership and all these things.

Guest

So, yeah, so my prediction is that those who follow the Kellers on these points will continue to go down a path that leads them towards egalitarianism.

Guest

And I think we've actually, I'll give some evidence of this.

Guest

We've seen some people do this.

Guest

Scott Sauls was a former PCA pastor, and he had some issues at his church.

Guest

There's some discipline.

Guest

And he, instead of coming back into the PCA, he actually left and went to the eCO, the echo, which is evangelical covenant order.

Guest

It's actually an egalitarian Presbyterian denomination.

Guest

He was a kellerite.

Guest

He was a disciple of Keller.

Guest

I mean, he talked about this.

Guest

And so, and, yeah, we have to distinguish the echo from, like, the EPC.

Guest

The EPC has its majority egalitarian now, but actually allows, you know, you don't have to be an egalitarian there.

Guest

But that's not the case.

Guest

If you go to echo.

Guest

If you go to Echo, you are an egalitarian, like you must affirm or, I guess, must deny male headship.

Guest

So, yeah, you've seen some guys from the PCA leave and go there.

Guest

And I just, you know, it raises questions about what exactly did they believe when they were in the PCA?

Guest

How firmly did they actually hold male headship?

Guest

I don't know.

Guest

I mean, I can't answer those things.

Guest

But a couple of other examples.

Guest

The last couple years there's been a case in the PCA, in the New York metro presbytery, which is where Tim Keller was in Redeemer.

Guest

They planted a bunch of churches in that area, and there was a church that allowed a.

Guest

I think she was an episcopal priest.

Guest

They allowed a woman, they clearly allowed a woman preacher.

Guest

She preached a sermon, I think.

Guest

I don't know if it was her.

Guest

I think she even administered the sacrament there, the supper.

Guest

Don't quote me on that, but something happened.

Guest

I think there was something with the supper, but I know she definitely preached.

Guest

And so there was discipline.

Guest

And part of the problem is the presbytery didn't have actually discipline.

Guest

The church that did that.

Guest

So that tells you something about the New York Metro presbytery.

Guest

And then that went up to the General assembly so the General assembly, the higher court, is handling that, and now it's off to the standing judicial commission, which is like basically the Supreme Court of the PCA.

Guest

So that's still going on because the SJC didn't want to take it up.

Guest

And if I remember correctly, I think the General assembly sent it back to the SJC.

Guest

So, but that's, that's still in process.

Guest

So that's, let's do what you will with that, but at least know that happened in the New York metro Presbyterian.

Guest

And then actually, I've seen some.

Guest

Well, this ties into another thing is, like, even in the PCA, there's a lot of churches that allow women to, they don't allow women to preach, but they'll allow women to lead other parts of worship.

Guest

And I mean, like, I'm specifically referring to, like, leading some prayers.

Guest

Maybe some even let them do the pastoral prayer, but don't call it that.

Guest

I was not calling it the pastoral prayer if a woman's doing it.

Guest

But I know some will at least let women do some smaller prayers, shorter prayers in the service.

Guest

And then probably the most common thing, and the Kellers used to do this all the time, or Tim Keller is they'd have women read scripture prior to the sermon.

Guest

I mean, that's pretty common.

Guest

If you ever listen to a Tim Keller Sermon, that's almost seemed like the majority of the time of the sermons I've heard by him is they, he'd have a woman read his scripture text.

Guest

Now I'm just going to say, I'm a preacher and I don't like anybody reading my text.

Guest

I want to read my own text before I get up there.

Guest

One, it's just, you know, it's fresh on my mind.

Guest

But two, I might add something, explain something, or just, I want to read it the way I want to read.

Guest

I want to make sure it's read well.

Guest

And I'm best suited to do that because I prepped from it all week.

Guest

So there's just that principle.

Guest

But that being said, our church, in our liturgy, we do have other scripture readings and prayers and things like that, and we only let elders do that.

Guest

So it either has to be me or as the teaching elder, pastor or a ruling elder.

Guest

I think along with the Westminster assembly, we'd make the exception of like a man who's training for the ministry.

Guest

He's an intern or he's a licentiate.

Guest

He might be licensed to preach by the Presbyterian.

Guest

That's fine.

Guest

I think all that's good just keeping with the spirit of the pastors and elders doing these things and the scripture texts.

Guest

I mean, the fact is you have entire, you have prohibitions on an entire class of people in the New Testament, and that would be on women.

Guest

So you have in one Timothy two, and then one corinthians 1434 and 35, which says, like, let the women be silent of the churches.

Guest

So, I mean, if you have these prohibitions on women as a class, that means women shouldn't be publicly speaking in church.

Guest

They shouldn't be teaching or exercising authority in the, over the congregation.

Guest

So, I mean, I think that's just pretty simple.

Guest

This is the reformed tradition.

Guest

I give, I give quotes to back all this up, even though I'll even, I'll note even the Westminster larger catechism, which.

Guest

The PCA, it's part of our standards.

Guest

I think it's one, it's 156.

Guest

I'd have to look, says are all to read.

Guest

It's basically asking all to read in public worship.

Guest

And the answer is it says, it says not all are to read.

Guest

And it gives some qualification.

Guest

Now, it doesn't say who's not to read.

Guest

Okay.

Guest

It's not, it's not, like, explicit.

Guest

I wish it were more explicit.

Guest

But what I show in there is the context that the Westminster assembly drafted other documents.

Guest

And so their directory for worship, you can go there and it very clearly connects.

Guest

And you see, ah, when they said all or not to read, they meant only ministers and those training for the ministry.

Guest

So they clearly didn't think women should be reading scripture in public worship.

Guest

So all that is to say, the Kellers, amongst others, have departed from the reformed tradition in this regard.

Guest

And one thing I'm trying to do is call them back to consistency here.

Guest

And I don't think it's good to have women leading, you know, in our worship services.

Guest

But there's kind of the spirit.

Guest

I mean, we all see it and it's not limited to the PCA or anything.

Guest

I mean, Wayne Grudem does this.

Guest

Tom Schreiner, you know, he's a Southern Baptist.

Guest

I mean, I've got quotes from there and from them in here.

Guest

And I think also masculine Christianity, where they're like, they're basically saying, you know, we, we obviously have to follow scripture, but, but we want to push women to as many positions as we can.

Guest

And I'm like, oh, whoa, whoa.

Guest

That's, that's not what I'm getting from the Bible.

Guest

You know, the Bible has prohibitions, but it, you know, it certainly isn't saying we should push for these, these other things.

Guest

Push the bot.

Guest

Push the boundary as much as you can.

Guest

No, that's a very modern, like, spirit.

Guest

That's a very modern feminist spirit.

Guest

And so I guess that's, that's just what I would say there is.

Guest

Like, that's.

Guest

They're not getting this stuff from the Bible.

Guest

I mean, I know someone might appeal to, like, first corinthians eleven five, which speaks of women praying and prophesying.

Guest

I deal with that.

Guest

The reformers all dealt with that.

Guest

I don't think it's permissive, certainly not a command.

Guest

And it's.

Guest

I raise questions about the context.

Guest

I don't.

Guest

I think it's about private or semi private situations, like a Bible study.

Guest

I don't think it's talking about public worship.

Guest

So anyway, there's a whole host of issues there.

Guest

But yeah, just to wrap up, we were saying is the Kellers have been a driver behind pushing this narrow complementarianism.

Will Spencer

As you were talking about those things, I remember reading masculine Christianity and just getting a sense of how fine the people who are trying to bring feminism into the church, how fine they slice things.

Will Spencer

It's actually pretty remarkable the amount of brain power that must be applied to, like, well, how can we just shave off just a little bit?

Will Spencer

Let's bring women into all these places where a plain reading of scripture explicitly prohibits that.

Will Spencer

But then you get, I think it's one corinthians eleven.

Will Spencer

You said, how much they hang on that one verse and that verse in context of everything else throughout all of the Bible.

Will Spencer

You can't say that, well, this is the little keyhole that we can squeeze things through, and yet they're trying.

Will Spencer

And that was the thing that was.

Zach Garris

So shocking to me, particularly in the.

Will Spencer

Section about the Kellers, is that obviously there's a lot of, we'll call it scriptural wisdom there, but that seems to have been used to like, well, what can we cut off to enable things that otherwise any sensible person would look and be like?

Will Spencer

That's not allowed.

Will Spencer

But because of their scriptural wisdom, they knew exactly where to push.

Will Spencer

And that's the troubling part to me.

Guest

Yeah, I think Bb Warfield, he got into as the old Princeton theologian, he got into that passage with one corinthians 14 and eleven, and he looks at eleven five by one, praying and prophesying.

Guest

And he says, what this means, basically, I'm paraphrasing what this means.

Guest

Nobody really knows.

Guest

And we're building up inference after inference when we start saying, well, oh, well, this means we should have women leading prayers and public worship.

Guest

That's what, it's one passage, one verse, not even a, it's not even really a passage.

Guest

It's like part of a passage, one verse phrase, and we're gonna, you know, run with it.

Guest

I mean, that's, that's basically how christian egalitarians work is.

Guest

They find anything.

Guest

They find, you know, they go to Deborah and.

Guest

Well, let's make Deborah normative.

Guest

I mean, that's pretty much how their, you know, hermeneutics work.

Guest

It's not good.

Guest

Nobody does this with other stuff you shouldn't.

Guest

It's not a good practice.

Guest

So we don't take the less clear things, the muddy things, and build whole doctrines and practices on it.

Guest

That's a bad idea.

Will Spencer

Yeah, don't do that.

Will Spencer

I remember in our first interview I asked you what the response had been to masculine Christianity.

Will Spencer

You gave a really good answer.

Will Spencer

But what has the response been to this book?

Will Spencer

Like, as you've launched out there into the world, what's, what's the response been?

Will Spencer

Broadly?

Guest

Yeah.

Guest

Well, I'm a little concerned because I only seem to get positive feedback.

Guest

So I, my thought is probably that, you know, my, my critics or people who don't like this stuff aren't, they either aren't reading it.

Guest

That's probably the most common thing is they don't, they don't want to touch the stuff I write or they read it and I, I mean, this is what I would hope.

Guest

They read it and they go, oh, I'm not interacting with that.

Guest

That's just going to get me in trouble.

Guest

And, I mean, that's kind of what I want.

Guest

I want people to read my books and think that they can't refute it and that there's no reason to even try publicly and they're just going to look bad.

Guest

So in this case, I mean, I argue things, right?

Guest

So this book is an argument.

Guest

It is contrasting, like, the older reform theologians with the modern, modern church, modern reform leaders and whatnot.

Guest

And one of the things that's trying to show is that we've departed from our reformed forefathers.

Guest

I think that's obvious.

Guest

I don't think that's debatable.

Guest

But what they would have to do, if you wanted to defend some sort of egalitarianism or narrow complementarianism, you would have to then take the position.

Guest

If you read my book, you'd have to say, well, they were all wrong.

Guest

Who wants to do that?

Guest

Right?

Guest

Who wants to say Calvin, Vermegley, Knox, guj you know, down the line, Perkins, everybody, they were all wrong.

Guest

They just, I know they all agreed, but they, they all misinterpreted the Bible.

Guest

They all got it wrong, and we today are right.

Guest

You know, I mean, that's, that's kind of a crazy position.

Guest

You know, I say in the book, it's, it's always possible that the church is erred.

Guest

But I, you know, when that's, that's more likely when there's like very variance in views and.

Guest

But when you have like a consensus, especially, I mean, you, I mean, this book only gets in the reformers.

Guest

I mean, you could also get into, I do get an American Presbyterian, some like the 18th, 19th century, which, you know, they're in line.

Guest

I mean, then you could throw in the church fathers and you could probably go in the medieval church, and when everybody's saying the same thing and they're all in, like central agreement.

Guest

Let's just put it this way.

Guest

The historical argument is not on the side of the feminists.

Guest

So anyway, to answer your question, I haven't received a lot of criticism.

Guest

I mean, but, you know, in one sense, it's good.

Guest

It's less controversy on my part, but I hope, and I do think what I'm doing with my books honor thy father's masculine christianity, is I'm trying to feed the brethren.

Guest

Right.

Guest

I'm trying to build up the church and give them tools and weapons for proper doctrine, for fighting egalitarianism, for fighting against narrow complementarianism.

Guest

And, yeah, I hope that's rallying the troops.

Guest

That's another thing is just kind of encouraging, encouraging the brethren.

Guest

So that's what I hope my books, even these interviews are doing, and just kind of get this stuff into other people's hands.

Will Spencer

I want to be respectful of your time, but I did have one more question, if you've got a minute.

Guest

Absolutely.

Will Spencer

So I wonder.

Will Spencer

Now, I don't want to spoil it, but it's one of my favorite parts of the book was the seven step process for feminization.

Will Spencer

And speaking of encouraging the brethren, I wonder if you could.

Will Spencer

I want people to read the book.

Will Spencer

It's at the end of the book.

Will Spencer

It's completely worth it to read the whole book.

Will Spencer

Exactly.

Will Spencer

But without giving it away, maybe you can talk a little bit about that process just a bit, because I found that to be very encouraging.

Guest

Yeah.

Guest

So I don't give it away.

Guest

I won't read it because I won't remember it.

Guest

Exactly.

Guest

But this is one of the things.

Will Spencer

I mean, I could read it this.

Guest

Is one of the funny things when you write a book, um, for those who haven't, is, you know, you don't remember every detail you wrote.

Guest

Uh, and I go back and reread things I've written before.

Will Spencer

Um, so, so I said that.

Will Spencer

Oh, yes.

Guest

Yeah.

Guest

As far as the conclusion goes, um, from what I recall, I basically, you know, say that, um, the church, there's kind of a trajectory.

Guest

The church slides into egalitarianism, and there's some steps.

Guest

And so some of those are like, the first I think I list is, well, they're not, they're not reading the older theology, older reformers on these issues.

Guest

You know, I think I say they read, they read the Puritans, but they don't, they don't read the Puritan.

Guest

William Googe, you know, he had a very popular book of domestical duties on the family, and they don't read that.

Guest

I said, how many pastors, how many pastors are handing out of domestical duties or recommending to their congregants?

Guest

You know, probably not very many.

Guest

Hopefully that changes.

Guest

But, and then, and then some of it just starts with, like, I think negligence is they're not doing the active things we need to do.

Guest

You know, teaching the scriptures on these passages and reading the reformers, they don't, they don't talk about women outside the home.

Guest

They kind of just let that be.

Guest

And the next thing you know, you've got all this massive cultural pressure of feminism, and then next thing you know, they're not even speaking on things really in the church significantly.

Guest

And so that's really, I mean, how I'd summarize it is there's, there's this negligence, and then it leads to, you know, women leading in all sorts of positions.

Guest

And that, you know, we end up with, like, this very, very narrow practice where it's just like, well, we just, we just won't have a woman as the senior pastor or a woman as the.

Guest

We just won't have a woman president of the college.

Guest

We'll just, you know, you know, have women in leadership all over.

Guest

And, I mean, how long does that last?

Guest

I mean, not very long where, well, we're going to at least keep a man as the senior pastor or president of the institution.

Guest

I mean, eventually, if you're putting women in leadership all around, then it's going to lead to, I think, you know, complete capitulation to egalitarianism.

Guest

So I don't know.

Guest

Was there anything else you want to add?

Guest

I mean, I do know.

Guest

I say, like, which way are we going to go, you know, as a church?

Guest

Are we going to, are we going to, we're going to follow the path of feminism or are we going to follow the path of our forefathers?

Will Spencer

The, the conclusion that kind of outlined what I liked about it was like, you laid out, this happens first, and then you'll see this happen, and then this happened.

Will Spencer

And this leads us to this egalitarian or perhaps even inverted kind of situation.

Will Spencer

And it was those seven steps that you laid out so clearly that it was so intuitive, like, oh, yes, obviously this inverted scenario is where that's going to lead to, and then you're not far from there, from the sparkle creed.

Will Spencer

Just throw yourself into it wholeheartedly.

Will Spencer

And what I found encouraging about that is I think it would help the brethren and the sistren, so to speak, to identify where their church might be in that process and reverse and reverse the trends.

Will Spencer

Like, if you're on stage three of a seven step process, you might be able to turn things around, if you can spot it for what it is.

Will Spencer

But of course, if you're at six or seven, perhaps, where it's already a five alarm fire, maybe not so much.

Guest

Yeah, that's a great point.

Guest

And I think if you're at this, well, without getting specifics, we can just say if you're, if you're like a narrow complementarianism, you, you can still salvage things, right?

Guest

I mean, you know, you don't have women officers in your church or women elders at least, or pastor, you know, you maybe you just, you just need to change some practices.

Guest

Hey, we've been having women, you know, do a lot of things up front that we shouldn't, we shouldn't be doing.

Guest

You can reverse course on that.

Guest

You can, as a session, actually, like, look into the issue and make a determination and then, and then change course.

Guest

And like you said it.

Guest

So instead of going down that path of like, well, actually, we're going to consider ordaining women as elders.

Guest

I mean, no, you can go back towards a more faithful, you know, traditional reform position.

Guest

So, yeah, for many, I think today it's not too late.

Guest

I mean, sometimes your church turns completely egalitarian and then, you know, you probably, if you're a member there or whatever, you probably just have to leave.

Guest

But, I mean, I have heard of occasional situations where pastors have gone in.

Guest

I don't think this is common.

Guest

But, you know, maybe of women elders and their female elders, and they're actually, they have, like, concerns about this.

Guest

I mean, they don't think this is ideal and they're willing to even step down.

Guest

And so that does happen.

Guest

So, yeah, I mean, I think we should be just positive in that.

Guest

Yeah, this stuff's messy.

Guest

There's a lot of problems in the church.

Guest

But I do think we should always be repenting and always be seeking greater faithfulness towards the Lord and all things.

Guest

And we can correct wrongs.

Guest

We might have made mistakes in the past.

Guest

We might have given into feminism in some ways, caved into culture, but we can, for the most part, reverse course, and it might bring some hardship.

Guest

It doesn't mean it's going to be easy, but that's what repentance looks like, and that's what faithfulness to God looks like.

Guest

So hopefully that's at least an encouraging note to end on, is that there is hope for improvement and greater faithfulness in these areas.

Will Spencer

Amen.

Will Spencer

That's very encouraging, especially because of the work that you've done in your two books.

Will Spencer

I'll just hold them up real quick.

Will Spencer

Honor thy fathers.

Will Spencer

And masculine Christianity paints such a clear picture.

Will Spencer

This is what it looks like.

Will Spencer

And here are the arguments that feminists and egalitarians marshal to misinterpret scripture.

Will Spencer

Here's what it actually means, and here's what our reformed forefathers once said.

Will Spencer

And putting the two books together, of course, here's what it looks like in our modern world.

Will Spencer

And so that clear picture that you've painted, it's a wake up call.

Will Spencer

Like, oh, this is not what it's supposed to look like.

Will Spencer

This is what it is supposed to look like, and we can start working our way back there.

Guest

Absolutely.

Will Spencer

Amen.

Will Spencer

Well, this has been a fantastic conversation yet again.

Will Spencer

Thank you so much for coming on the show, and thank you so much for writing your books.

Will Spencer

Where would you like to send people to find out more about you and what you do?

Guest

Yeah, you can find message and Christianity on Amazon.

Guest

Honor thy fathers.

Guest

At least the ebook is on Amazon.

Guest

Otherwise you have to go to the new Christendom press page for the hardback.

Guest

But hey, it's worth having the hardback.

Guest

I think it's a nice addition.

Guest

Otherwise people can go to my website.

Guest

I write fairly regularly@knowingscripture.com.

Guest

comma.

Guest

That's more Bible based articles.

Guest

Sometimes I write for other websites, but, yeah, otherwise you can follow me on Twitter acerygarris.

Will Spencer

Wonderful, wonderful.

Will Spencer

Well, thank you.

Will Spencer

Real quick, do you have another book planned, or is there something in the works?

Guest

I am working on a project with a friend, Sean McGowan, on the southern Presbyterians so it's more of a historical.

Guest

I mean, I guess this last book was somewhat hysterical, but at church, I've been teaching through american presbyterian church history, and I've been heavily, you know, kind of studying the southerners in particular.

Guest

And so I think that book will be useful because there's not a lot on the southern presbyterian church.

Guest

I mean, that's the.

Guest

Well, the mother church of the PCA.

Guest

The PCA actually came out of the southern presbyterian church in 1973, and there's a lot of interesting history there.

Guest

And, yeah, I mean, I love the reformers, but I also love american Presbyterians.

Guest

So I hope this will be of use, and I certainly think it'll be interesting.

Guest

We've uncovered a lot of information and probably gone through more books than I had hoped to.

Will Spencer

You mean, you also had a really nice appearance.

Will Spencer

I think I'm gonna get the date wrong, but I think it's the 1607 project.

Guest

Yes.

Will Spencer

I was very happy to see you in that documentary.

Guest

Yeah.

Will Spencer

Maybe you could talk about that for just a minute.

Guest

Yeah, yeah, real briefly.

Guest

So that was with the Abbeville Institute, and I had written articles for them several years back, and then I got asked to contribute an essay on religion in Virginia because that was a.

Guest

This is for the 1607 project book.

Guest

They also did a book, America first.

Guest

So I contributed that chapter.

Guest

And actually, that's kind of what got me started on writing on the southern Presbyterians is I was.

Guest

I mean, I had read a lot on, like, Robert Louis Dabney and some other guys, but I ended up really diving in to other southern figures like John Holt Rice.

Guest

He was an important guy in Virginia.

Guest

But there's also Archibald Alexander was from Virginia.

Guest

He was the first professor of theology at Princeton Seminary in 1812.

Guest

So he's kind of a big name.

Guest

I mean, his student is the most famous.

Guest

It was Charles Hodge.

Guest

But, yeah, there's just a lot of great history there.

Guest

And so then I was asked to be in the documentary the Virginia first, the 1607 project.

Guest

So that's available on YouTube.

Guest

It's free.

Guest

And I think it's great.

Guest

It's got a lot of good history.

Guest

It's kind of contrasting Virginia with, like, the New England Puritans.

Guest

And I certainly think there's good of both groups.

Guest

But there are some, like some things you see at least note here is, you know, I think.

Guest

I think, you know, the south's referred to as the Bible belt still today, and kind of orthodox Christianity survived longer in the south.

Guest

So there's.

Guest

We can discuss why that's the case, you know, there's differing opinions, but the fact is I think there's something healthy about, you know, Southern Christianity.

Will Spencer

Yeah, John Harris and I talked a little bit about that when he was on the podcast that came out a couple weeks ago at this point in time.

Will Spencer

But it was maybe when you finished this book on southern Presbyterians, because I think a lot of people in America don't really understand where the different Presbyterian denominations came from.

Will Spencer

And there is a very large Baptist to Presbyterian pipeline that's happening right now.

Will Spencer

Certainly I had my own journey through that.

Will Spencer

I think that could be a really interesting thing to inform people, like, well, the traditions in America, the denominational traditions, they have specific roots in specific places and times that I think we can feel, but that we don't necessarily know.

Will Spencer

Because what's the joke that church history for american Protestants began with Billy Graham?

Will Spencer

Something like that.

Guest

Yeah, I don't like that joke because that's unfortunately an insult to probably what many people believe.

Guest

Yeah, I mean, Presbyterian, part of the problem is Presbyterian history is kind of complicated because it came out of, came out of Scotland.

Guest

I mean, it has its roots in the reformation, like, you know, Calvinism and reformed theology, but came out of Scotland and, but then you have the american presbyterian church.

Guest

It's its own thing, but you have splits and divisions, new school, old school, and then northern southern church and then reunions and then liberalism in the, in the 20th century.

Guest

So a lot of it gets, there's definitely some like, you know, complicated factors involved, which is why it's been great on my part to teach through it, but also really dive into the, to the sources.

Guest

And so hopefully, yeah, I mean, I think the book's gonna be pretty long, but it's gonna have a lot of biography in it and theology, and I think people will like that.

Guest

But even I could probably do some interviews and, like, explain some of the details, make it a little clearer for people, give them big, big picture information on, like, american Presbyterianism that hopefully will be useful.

Guest

Because like I said, I like both the 16th and 17th century reform theologians.

Guest

I think we should embrace them.

Guest

But I also think there's a lot of good to embrace from the american Presbyterians.

Will Spencer

I agree.

Will Spencer

And I think as America tries to find its way forward with its christian identity in terms of christian nationalism, what does that actually look like?

Will Spencer

What actually is our christian history in America?

Will Spencer

Because it's kind of fuzzy.

Will Spencer

Once you get past 19 hundreds looking backwards, it's fuzzy for a lot of people.

Will Spencer

But I do think that those themes are still very present, but we don't know how to recognize them, perhaps.

Guest

Yeah.

Guest

And maybe if I could just add one thing here is one of the interesting things with the American Presbyterians is they kind of bridge the gap.

Guest

So if we're talking christian nationalism, like christian government and things like that, is, you know, most people we know what we have today, we might read about the reformers.

Guest

Oh, they had like, you know, christian magistrates and things like that.

Guest

But what you have in the United States is that the early colonies were christian for the most part.

Guest

I mean, you had different levels of establishment.

Guest

I mean, you had like the, you know, New England Puritans had the congregational church, but then in the south you had a lot of anglican establishments, but then they had strong dissenters like the Presbyterians, Baptists, and then eventually the Methodists, which came out of the Anglicans.

Guest

But what's interesting is, like, so you had this kind of transition is, you know, people always say the First Amendment, freedom of religion, those kind of things, but that actually was only a prohibition on the federal government from establishing a church.

Guest

But the states were trying to sort out, well, how are we going to do things?

Guest

So, like, Virginia had to disestablish their church before.

Guest

Before the US Constitution, right before.

Guest

And then, you know, some of the other states, like South Carolina actually for twelve years, had a general establishment that allowed for like, just the generally established Christianity.

Guest

Now, they didn't keep it, but a lot of those states did keep like, requirements that magistrates were Protestants even.

Guest

They had to affirm the protestant religion.

Guest

And eventually, over time, some of that stuff just kind of faded away and, you know, we became more pluralistic in the United States.

Guest

But, yeah, I think it's the history there is at least interesting.

Guest

And it certainly shows that while I wouldn't say America was strictly a christian country, because in one sense, we're a republic, we did have like christian states within the republic.

Guest

And so, yeah, I mean, that's just, that's just the history there is.

Guest

America at one point was like 98% protestant and mostly british origin, and with immigration and things started to change in the 18 hundreds.

Guest

But, yeah, so a lot of history there that people just unfortunately are unfamiliar with.

Guest

But I think hopefully we can change that.

Guest

Hopefully it's starting to change some now and we'll continue to change it in the future.

Will Spencer

Well, I definitely look forward to that book coming out and reading it and we can, we can have another conversation like this one.

Will Spencer

I've enjoyed our chats.

Guest

Yeah, absolutely.

Guest

I'd be glad to do that at some point.

Will Spencer

Cool.

Will Spencer

Well, thank you so much, Zach.

Will Spencer

This has been great, and definitely, everyone, go out and buy, honor thy fathers and provoke a feminist today.