This podcast episode features a deep discussion on the impact of feminism within the church and society, highlighting how the traditional roles of men and women have been challenged over the decades.
Zach Garris, author of "Honor Thy Fathers" and "Masculine Christianity" emphasizes the importance of adhering to the teachings of the Reformation, specifically regarding male headship and the roles assigned to women in the home, church, and commonwealth.
Through an exploration of historical figures like John Knox and William Gouge, the conversation underscores the dangers of deviating from these foundational principles, which can lead to a feminization of the church and society.
The episode also critiques contemporary leaders, including Tim Keller and his wife, for their narrow complementarian stance and the implications of their teachings on church practices today. Listeners are encouraged to consider the historical context of these discussions and the potential for reforming modern practices to align more closely with traditional Christian teachings.
Takeaways:
{{promo-links}}
Hello.
Will SpencerMy name is Will Spencer and thanks.
Zach GarrisFor joining me for the Will Spencer podcast.
Zach GarrisThis is a weekly interview show featuring extended discussions with authors, leaders, and influencers who can help us make sense of our changing world.
Zach GarrisToday I release new episodes every week on Friday.
Zach GarrisMy guest this week is Zach Garris, who's returning to the podcast.
Zach GarrisZack is a husband, father, pastor, and the author of two books including Masculine.
Will SpencerChristianity and the new honor Thy fathers.
Zach GarrisFeminism is in the cultural and political crosshairs today.
Will SpencerPraise God.
Zach GarrisBecause for the first time since womens liberation exploded into western consciousness in the mid 20th century, cultural commentators have actual evidence to back up their critiques.
Zach GarrisNaturally, 60 million aborted infants is in itself an incriminating statistic.
Zach GarrisBut with marriage and birth rates collapsing, antidepressant use soaring, and women's self reported happiness declining generation over generation, we can see that the feminist experiment is failing in culture, politics, and economics.
Zach GarrisIndeed, it's failing in civilization as a whole, albeit slowly.
Zach GarrisThe evidence can even be seen as far away as Korea and Japan.
Zach GarrisWith birth rates so far below replacement, they've reached the level of national emergency.
Zach GarrisBut strangely, the one place feminism doesn't.
Will SpencerAppear to be failing is in the.
Zach GarrisChurch, which always lags behind the times.
Zach GarrisWhile the Kamala Harris candidacy is representing both the apex and nadir of feminism, churches are seeking ways to expand feminism's influence in both local and national bodies, despite the clear word of God.
Zach GarrisOtherwise, some churches and national organizations insist that women can be preachers and pastors, putting together endless study commissions to explore something thats been clear for 2000 years.
Zach GarrisAnd yet some organizations that call themselves churches and yet are not, have gone tragically soft on abortion, claiming it might be a womans choice and we should be more compassionate, less faithful, more empathetic, and less dogmatic.
Zach GarrisNaturally, this is also a result of feminism that prioritizes womens feelings over gods truth.
Zach GarrisNow let me be clear.
Zach GarrisThere is also a movement of churches out there that are prioritizing men's feelings primarily of anger, as a result of what we're talking about with women.
Zach GarrisThat is not better, it might even be worse.
Zach GarrisAnd it's another podcast.
Zach GarrisSo in the meantime, we can talk about church's capitulations to the demands of feminism without directly answering but what about the men?
Zach GarrisSo let's talk about feminism in the church.
Will SpencerAnyone?
Will SpencerAnyone?
Zach GarrisBueller?
Zach GarrisAnd therein lies the problem.
Zach GarrisBecause in a reformed faith that has so much to say about politics, culture and even economics, there's often a shocking silence when it comes to something much more fundamental the nature of men, women, and our shared roles, responsibilities, and destinies together.
Zach GarrisBut it wasn't always so.
Zach GarrisWhich brings me back to Zach Garris and his new book, honor Thy fathers, out now on new Christendom Press.
Zach GarrisIn his brief, inaccessible work, Zack demonstrates the traditional stance of the reformed faith towards feminism, sort of because feminism wasn't really a thing during the age of the reformers.
Zach GarrisBut the word of God still rang true, which is why Luther, Calvin, Knox, Turretin Warfield, and many other reformers and Puritans were bracingly clear on women's roles in the home, church and government, namely, that they are not to teach or have authority over men.
Zach GarrisPeriod.
Zach GarrisFull stop.
Zach GarrisNot that women can't have authority at all, as in over fellow women and children, just not over men.
Zach GarrisThat's a hard teaching.
Zach GarrisI know there are so many cultural and political incentives to egalitarianism and what's known as broad complementarianism, which is basically the same thing.
Zach GarrisBut the word of God is clear, and things go better for us, men and women, when we submit ourselves to it, because the fifth commandment is the only one with a promise.
Zach GarrisAnd that is where Zack derived the title of his book from, to help us understand that honoring male authority is following the Fifth Commandment, as elucidated in the Westminster confession of faith and elsewhere.
Zach GarrisSo, as Zack writes in one of the most memorable first sentences I've read recently, feminism has fallen on hard times of late.
Zach GarrisBut it has not fallen on hard enough times.
Zach GarrisI couldn't agree more, and I hope feminism continues to fall on hard times outside the church and harder times within it.
Zach GarrisMay Zach Garriss new book, Honor Thy fathers, contribute to that effort.
Zach GarrisIf you enjoy the will Spencer podcast, thank you.
Zach GarrisPlease give us a five star rating on Spotify, plus a five star rating and review on Apple Podcasts.
Zach GarrisAnd if you really want to help this show grow, share this episode or another one of your favorites with a friend of if you'd like to support the show financially, there are some easy ways to do that.
Zach GarrisFirst, head to Willspencerpod, dot Substack.com and become a paid subscriber.
Zach GarrisYou'll get access to ad free interviews every week, plus other perks as the page grows.
Zach GarrisOr you can click buy me a coffee in the show notes.
Zach GarrisBut the most important thing you can do is support our advertisers.
Zach GarrisI've curated every advertiser that appears on this show, and purchasing their products and services bring multigenerational wealth back to the christian community so we can rebuild a christian foundation to the west.
Zach GarrisAnd please welcome this week's guest on the Will Spencer podcast, the author of honor thy fathers, Zach Garris.
Will SpencerZach, welcome back to the podcast.
GuestThanks for having me.
Will SpencerI have here the Zach Garris collection, masculine Christianity and honor thy fathers.
Will SpencerCongratulations on your second book.
Will SpencerI like to call honor thy fathers the reformed strike back.
Will SpencerSo congratulations on this.
GuestThanks.
GuestYeah, it's kind of complimentary book, I think, to masculine Christianity.
Will SpencerVery much so.
Will SpencerIn fact, I remember when I had you on to talk about masculine Christianity maybe a year, year and a half ago, something like that.
Will SpencerAnd having read on to thy fathers now, it feels very much like a couple missing chapters and away from masculine Christianity.
Will SpencerNot that the book felt incomplete, but that the two fit together really well, almost as if they could be the same volume, which is a great way to write a couple books.
GuestYeah, I think so.
GuestI mean, they're obviously different angles.
GuestThey could all go in the same book.
GuestThere's some overlap, but honor thy fathers is more of a historical angle.
GuestSo for people who are interested in that, I think it's useful.
GuestAnd then also it does get a little more into, I guess you could say, like the narrow complementarianism in the particular, in the reformed world.
GuestI mean, there's some of that in masculine Christianity, but, yeah, a little bit different book.
Will SpencerYeah, it's definitely a different posture on the same sets of issues.
Will SpencerSo I think I remember masculine Christianity being very heavily heavy on exegesis, like in the posture of these verses, in contrast to what the feminists say about them.
Will SpencerAnd then it's let's go and do a historical survey of what our reformed forefathers used to say about these verses, in contrast to more of like the modern approach that the church is taking to egalitarianism, complementarianism and feminism.
Will SpencerReally?
GuestYeah, absolutely.
Will SpencerSo when you sat down to write honor thy fathers, did you have this book sort of like, was it kind of percolating in your mind for a while after masculine Christianity?
Will SpencerWhat was the genesis of this book pun allowed?
GuestYeah, well, actually I was initially asked to write an essay on, um, basically the reformers on male rule, male headship.
GuestAnd so that got, that got things started, and then that actually, the guys who asked me to do that, that ended up not going anywhere.
GuestAnd so I had this essay sitting around and I was like, what am I going to do with this?
GuestIt's, it seemed too long, you know, to post on the Internet.
GuestSo then, you know, it's just kind of over time I started adding to it and I had more books I had acquired and was looking through things.
GuestAnd I think it was always kind of in the back of my mind because the essay was just sitting there and I hadn't done anything with it.
GuestSo I eventually just kept adding to it and refining it.
GuestAnd then I was like, well, I think this could actually make a whole book be a little bit shorter.
GuestBut I think I was able to, you know, add enough that it made for a book.
GuestAnd so that's, that.
GuestThat's what came to be.
GuestHonor thy fathers.
GuestI mean, it's not, it's not super short, but it's actually maybe the kind of length of book people like to read.
GuestYou know, where it's 100 to 150 pages, Macedonian Christianity was like 300.
GuestI tend to be not necessarily long winded, but it's easy on, like, a subject like this to.
GuestTo write more.
GuestSo, yeah, that's why I think this book is somewhat useful.
GuestIs it for people where it's a.
GuestIt is a different angle.
GuestIt's not the same book as Mexican Christianity.
GuestIt has some of the same themes, but in some sense, it's maybe a little more accessible.
GuestPeople might actually start with this book and then say, hey, oh, I want to.
GuestActually want to read masculine Christianity and dive a little more into the scripture passages.
GuestSo, yeah, I.
Will SpencerAnd I know that this came out on new Christendom press, which is, I mean, it's a beautiful book.
Will SpencerPeople listening can't really see it, but you should definitely check it out.
Will SpencerLovely design and cover.
Will SpencerAnd I think one of the things that it captures is this spirit of, hey, these questions that we're struggling with in the church right now, they've been answered.
Will SpencerThis is not new.
Will SpencerIt didn't just spring up out of the ground.
Will SpencerThe reformers dealt with this hundreds of years ago.
Will SpencerSo maybe you can start, maybe you can offer some examples of some of the reformers that you surveyed, some of the things they had to say about some of these egalitarian and feminist kind of questions.
Will SpencerBecause when I saw that recovering the anti feminist theology of the reformers as the subtitle, I'm like, let's go.
Will SpencerSo I appreciated that you dove into that to find some of those things that I think people today needed to hear.
GuestYeah, I mean, the subtitle's a little bit anachronistic, right?
GuestI mean, feminism was not a term back then.
GuestI mean, they were around before the movement was around.
GuestBut I mean, the thing is, you've always had kind of elements of feminism in the world.
GuestI mean, you've had rebellion against male rule and God's design and marriage and throughout society.
GuestAnd so none of that's new.
GuestBut I think, you know, part of the reason I titled it the anti feminist theology of the reformers is their theology.
GuestThey had a theology of men and women and male headship, and they clearly opposed what we would today call feminism.
GuestAnd so their writings are still very applicable to our day.
GuestAnd though we're writing, you know, this side of feminism, and so there's some things we might add, you know, particularly to the historical context.
GuestTheir writings are still, you know, extremely helpful and.
GuestAnd especially practically.
GuestRight.
GuestBecause they're.
GuestThey're getting into the Bible and.
GuestAnd doing theology.
GuestSo, yeah, I mean, you mentioned examples.
GuestI mean, I.
GuestYou have, like William Goodge, for example, he wrote a book of domestic duties.
GuestGoodge was a member of the Westminster assembly that drafted the Westminster confession and catechisms.
GuestAnd his book of domestic duties is like a very practical work on the home.
GuestI mean, it's not just on male headship.
GuestI mean, it gets in everything, parenting.
GuestAnd so it's got.
GuestIt's got instructions for husbands, for wives, and other aspects of the home.
GuestSo it's a very good book.
GuestIt's very popular.
GuestI think it was 1622 when it came out, and you can find it online today.
GuestI mean, it's a little older.
GuestEnglish reformation heritage has republished it as, like, a more modern, modern English.
GuestBut they did.
GuestThey did more than just some spelling corrections.
GuestSo, I mean, I don't love that.
GuestBut overall, it's good.
GuestThey don't change the wording too much.
GuestBut if you want to quote it or something, obviously you can just go look up the original online because it's free.
GuestBut anyway, so, I mean, good even gets into there, like, you know, when he's dealing with husbands and wives, I mean, he's definitely getting into the details of what headship should look like and the marital relationship.
GuestAnd so, I mean, he's dealing with situations where, like, you know, he mentions women who don't obey their husbands, you know, don't submit and don't follow their lead.
GuestAnd so, I mean, he's got.
GuestHe's got things to say that are, you know, probably somewhat offensive to some people, but that's at least, like, kind of one example in marriage.
GuestAnd then you would have.
GuestI mean, there's other quotes in there.
GuestI mean, there's just so people know, listeners know.
GuestThe first three chapters of my book are male rule in the home, church and then the Commonwealth.
GuestSo I get into all of those.
GuestAnd then I'm looking at the reformed on those different spheres.
GuestAnd so, I mean, there's not as much on the church in one sense, because they weren't dealing with like, this push for women pastors, um, like, like we have today.
GuestBut, but they still have, they still have teachings that they applied.
GuestThey applied like, first Timothy two and one corinthians 1434 and 35 and other passages to, to prohibit women from, uh, preaching and leadership in the church.
GuestSo, um, yeah, I mean, there's, there's all sorts of stuff in here we can discuss, but maybe that's enough for, for now.
Will SpencerYeah.
Will SpencerJust to go back to something you said about it, the reformers weren't talking about feminism.
Will SpencerThat wasn't really part of their world, but they were observing some of the same trends, some of the same behaviors, some of the same sins that have now taken shape in a socio political, in even theological kind of posture.
Will SpencerSo it wasn't that they would have described themselves as feminists or anti feminist.
Will SpencerThey didn't know what that was.
Will SpencerBut they had made the same observations that many people are doing today, and they had spoken into these particular issues in their writings.
Will SpencerAnd so I guess we can go to the past to find what our forefathers honor thy fathers would have said about some of the same things that we're facing today and apply it to our modern challenges.
Will SpencerIt feels like that's kind of the spirit of the book.
GuestYeah, absolutely.
GuestI mean, the goal of, or like you said, the spirit of the book.
GuestIt's taking the teachings and principles of the older reformed theologians.
GuestJust to be clear, it's the 16th and 17th century reformers is what I focus on, because that would be the actual reformers, like Calvin.
GuestI mean, I mentioned Luther a little bit, but it's mostly Calvin, Calvin and Bollinger.
GuestAnd I mean, there's others again, too.
GuestThere's more probably the post reformation reformers, reformed orthodox, they've come that are a little bit later that, that's like Goog and Vermigli and others like that.
GuestSo there's.
GuestSorry, Vermigli is actually earlier.
GuestHe's a reformer so much, that's, that's another guy.
GuestHe's Dutch.
Will SpencerI was wondering how to say.
Will SpencerI was gonna, I was gonna say his name, but I don't know how.
GuestTo say I put in there.
GuestI think it even has like a f sound.
GuestTechnically, it's like Fuchsius.
GuestYeah, fuchsia.
GuestSo, yeah, it's, that's a hard one.
GuestGazbertus is his first name.
GuestSo he's a dutch guy, but there's actually not a lot, a lot of his stuff is not translated, so he's somewhat hard to access in English.
GuestBut, um, yeah, I think it's just, you know, it's part of the advantage of going and reading those older theologians is the fact that they're, they're, they don't have the pressure that we do, you know, today, I mean, where we feel like we have to qualify everything or pastors today are afraid to almost even read certain portions of scripture because they're, they're very, you know, patriarchal or whatever.
GuestI mean, male, they teach male headship and so, you know, they just didn't really fear speaking on those things back in the day.
GuestI mean, that's not to say we shouldn't be sensitive, you know, to our context and hearers, but I just think it's helpful to go read these older guys and realize, you know, they pretty much all said the same thing with some variation.
GuestAnd if that's the case, then that's a pretty good argument that they were right.
GuestI mean, if you're reformed, right, if you, if you'd like them on, if you like the reformed theologians on justification and, you know, everything else theologically, then we should, we should care what they thought about mail headship and the like.
Will SpencerNow, were you aware going in of what some of the reformers had said?
Will SpencerOr was it kind of like a research project?
Will SpencerLike, did you know where to start?
Will SpencerOr was it your own kind of journey to go through these men's writings to find out what they had said about these issues?
GuestI mean, I had a pretty good idea from things I had seen that they were all going to at least hold what we would consider, like traditional teaching regarding male rule, certainly in the home and church.
GuestAnd I guess I didn't know exactly what they would all say about the Commonwealth.
GuestI mean, I had seen some differences between Calvin and Knox that I had even mentioned, I think, in masculine Christianity.
GuestSo I think probably what happened is I had a good idea.
GuestBut as I was researching this book, you know, it's kind of refining things and, you know, understanding even the different nuances, especially on the point between Calvin and Knox.
GuestAnd I found other guys who spoke on that question, such as Beza and Bollinger.
GuestSo, yeah, I mean, and even that, I mean, I'll even say now, I mean, the book is nothing.
GuestIt's not exhaustive.
GuestI mean, there's, there's lots of theologians I don't mention, and you could probably find even more, although I think one of the challenges is trying to find, I mean, there were the reform, the older reformed theologians wrote a lot.
GuestSo, you know, because they didn't do a lot of books directly on the subject.
GuestIt wasn't, you know, major controversy at the time.
GuestAnd so sometimes it's hard to find the quotes you have to read through fair amount or skim or know what you're, you know, looking for.
GuestAnd so, so, like I said, there is more you could find out there, I'm sure.
GuestBut I tried to, I tried to get at least as much as I could in there.
GuestI mean, especially, I'm hitting kind of the big names like Calvin and Gooch because he has that of domestical duties, John Knox.
GuestI mean, he's, he's got the whole book on the trumpet blast against the monstrous regiment of women.
GuestSo I had to get that one in there.
GuestAnd then I do get into the reformed confessions a little bit, where I mentioned the Heidelberg catechism on the fifth commandment, but then more so, the Westminster larger catechism, because it has more questions on the fifth commandment.
GuestIt has, like ten of them, I think.
GuestAnd so some of that's like, even looking at the, the fifth command is honor your father and mother.
GuestAnd so broadly, they understood that to apply to all authority structures.
GuestSo that would include marriage.
GuestNow, it doesn't always spell that out explicitly in, like, the Westminster large catechism, but if you go look at the language that he uses for the fifth commandment, and then you also look at the verses it's citing, so the proof text, and it's clear that they include marriage in there.
GuestYou know, they'll cite, like, parts of one Peter three, and I know they at least cite that one, but maybe Ephesians five as well.
GuestAnd so you can see that when they're citing these texts and then they're using this language that, I mean, I mean, part of the problem is they're speaking of authority structures.
GuestThey're speaking of authority structures in general, like, what should the superior authority do and what should the inferior authority do and the duties and sins.
GuestAnd so that's why it's language that would be used both for, like, for superiors, abuse, for husband, but also, like the civil magistrate and parents, even with children.
GuestBut they did include it in there.
GuestAnd you can even see that in, like, some expositions of the larger catechism, which I mentioned some of them in there.
GuestThat's just how they, that's how they understood the fifth commandment.
GuestAnd so that's just a way.
GuestI think that's maybe an important thing to mention is that's something we don't often think about today.
GuestI mean, unfortunately, the church today doesn't even always teach the Ten Commandments, but that was always a big deal back in the day.
GuestYou would learn the Ten Commandments, the Lord's prayer and even catechisms.
GuestThat was common as they would exposit these things, they would go through the Ten Commandments and ask questions, how do we understand this?
GuestWhat does this mean, each commandment?
GuestAnd then they would do the same with like the different lines of the Lord's prayer.
GuestAnd so when you do that, they actually had a whole theology under christian ethics.
GuestI mean, so that's what this would fall in.
GuestThere was christian ethics.
GuestBut you can see how they under, at least that's the context for how they were teaching on marriage in male headship.
Will SpencerSo they were using the fifth commandment as a way to explain the concept of male headship and authority and submission in the context of the home specifically.
GuestYes.
GuestSo that's their primary target.
GuestThere would be the home.
GuestNow, when you read the reformers, and I have quotes in the book about this, but they, they saw the home as kind of the foundation for then the other spheres of church and state, or Commonwealth, as they would often call it.
GuestSo the language, like William Perkins, I know he used it and maybe Googe as well, where they said that they referred to the family as the seminary of the church and the family as the seminary of the Commonwealth.
GuestAnd so the reason is that's like the language of seed is what it's getting at.
GuestAnd so they're seeing the family as like the models, the seed of the church.
GuestAnd so, I mean, you actually see this even in scripture.
GuestThey're not just making this up.
GuestYou go to like one Timothy three, and you've got Paul.
GuestHe's speaking of elders in the church.
GuestAnd one of the requirements is he says that the elder must manage his household.
GuestWell, that's, I believe, verse four and five and one Timothy three.
GuestAnd so he says, if a man doesn't know how to manage his household, how will he care for the church?
GuestAnd so you have that very requirement is that the home is a model for the church.
GuestAnd so the church is made up of households, it's made up of different families.
GuestThe same is true of the commonwealth.
GuestAnd so, I mean, I think this is just the principle is you need to be able to manage your home well.
GuestAnd those who do that well and then are called to leadership rule in the church, or teaching in particular, would be like a pastor or teaching elder.
GuestYou know, those men would be called to the eldership.
GuestThey have to be confirmed by the church, of course, so.
GuestBut you have that very practice there, and I think the same would apply to the civil realm, to the commonwealth.
GuestNow, we don't.
GuestThe Bible doesn't make those demands, but I think that's a reasonable requirement as we look at a civil magistrate.
GuestHe's going to be managing, caring for the citizens.
GuestI mean, how is he going to rule over other families if his.
GuestHis own family is a mess?
GuestI think that's a good, good principle.
GuestUnfortunately, in America, we don't seem to care about that anymore.
GuestIt's kind of gone out the window.
GuestMost.
Will SpencerRight.
GuestYou know, most politicians, their families are absolute disasters, so.
GuestWhich maybe explains things with politics, but.
Will SpencerAmen.
GuestYeah, I don't.
GuestSo just to bring it back, that's the idea, is the family is there in the Westminster larger catechism under the fifth commandment, and they're reasoning their way from the family to these other spheres, and they definitely see a connection there.
Will SpencerI think that does probably explain why we're at.
Will SpencerWhere we're at is that there's been a general devaluing of the family for the past 60 years, generously 100 or more if we want to get really into it.
Will SpencerAnd that process has undermined male rule everywhere else.
Will SpencerYou can go back, and again, we're talking about in a context of modern feminism.
Will SpencerYou go back to the 1960s, you see the devaluation.
Will SpencerIn fact, actually, just as a bit of an aside, in my church signal group with all the guys, we're talking about the bear and stain bears now, okay, I'm old enough to remember when they were the Berenstein bears, but that's a whole other conversation.
Will SpencerBut about how those children's books, which I read as a little kid, were actually pretty feminist with the bumbling dad and the mom kind of in charge.
Will SpencerAnd of course, I was a little kid, I wasn't paying attention to that.
Will SpencerBut that shows how far back this idea goes.
Will SpencerYou can go into all in the family, the subversion of the male rule, dad is a loudmouth bigot, etcetera.
Will SpencerSo you see these themes that we're all kind of doing in culture, that we're participating in or kind of immersed in to undermine male rule in the home.
Will SpencerAnd that has had cascading effects of undermining male rule in the church and then in the state, perhaps at the same time.
Will SpencerAnd so the reformers would have looked at it and said, the male rule in the home as established in the fifth commandment is the central ground and the pillar of male rule everywhere else in society.
Will SpencerProceeding from the home outwards.
GuestYeah, I mean, I think so.
GuestAnd when, when the home therefore collapses, I mean, this is a problem.
GuestIt's going to affect everywhere else.
GuestAnd so I think, I mean, look, there is an interconnectedness, right?
GuestObviously, the church helps support families, right.
GuestBecause they're, they're overseeing them, the elders, they're preaching to families to fulfill their duties.
GuestAnd I would say that the state is also supposed to support families.
GuestI think they don't always do a good job in our culture.
GuestRight.
GuestSo.
GuestBut some of that would be like.
Will SpencerDivorce law, the opposite.
GuestYeah, yeah, right.
GuestLike no fault divorce, I mean, actually, I would argue, undermines, well, male headship because the wife could say, well, I don't want to submit to my husband.
GuestI'm just going to divorce him.
GuestAnd the state, there's no punishment.
GuestThere's no, I mean, I pointed this out.
GuestIn masculine Christianity, you know, divorce is, well, marriage is a involves, it's a Christians, we believe it's a covenant.
GuestI know that Roman Catholics call it a sacrament.
GuestI don't agree with that.
GuestIt is a covenant.
Will SpencerBut don't worry, they're not here.
Will SpencerThey're not here right now.
GuestI mean, there could be some listening.
GuestI don't know.
GuestBut so, yeah, you know, we do believe it's, it's a covenant, but, but legally, it's going to have the, you know, it serves as a contract.
GuestBut, so basically, the way at least I can just speak on us law is, and the states differ in some regard, but they, they have their default laws, default rules for the contract.
GuestAnd so you get married, you go sign the marriage license and.
GuestYeah, I mean, you can, you can modify it with, you can modify the marriage contract with a prenuptial agreement.
GuestI mean, that's, that's allowed.
GuestThere's sometimes limitations on it, but you can do that.
GuestBut the problem is, is the default contract is no fault divorce in most states.
GuestNow, if all states, I think, have it.
GuestYeah, New York was like the last one, ironically, it was New York.
GuestThat was the last one.
GuestChange it.
GuestWhich wasn't that long ago, actually, maybe the last 20 years.
GuestSo, you know, where it used to be required that you would show fault to get a divorce and now you don't have to do that.
GuestI mean, some states make you wait a little bit longer.
GuestIf you don't, if it's not consensual.
GuestIt's not agreed by both parties.
GuestBut the point being is, unfortunately, the default rules are now either party can unilaterally, unilaterally file for divorce, and there's no punishment.
GuestThere's no.
GuestEven though they might have breached the contract, they might cheated on their spouse or something, or just they're getting out of the marriage and the other party doesn't want to.
GuestI mean, that seems like a breach of contract, but there's no penalties.
GuestIt's just judges tend to.
GuestI mean, there's been some problems here, but judges tend to at least the trend now is they just.
GuestThey don't want to hear anything.
GuestThey just split things 50 50, children, you know, parenting time, and then also finances and the like.
GuestSo that's kind of where we've trained.
GuestWe're training in the United States.
GuestBut the problem is that doesn't support strong families.
GuestRight.
GuestWe don't have laws in place to actually keep families together.
GuestWe don't have.
GuestI mean, we have more and more laws that don't protect children.
GuestI mean, so.
GuestOh, that's bad.
GuestI mean, some of the, you know, transgender laws.
GuestSo there's all sorts of things there.
GuestAnd all that is to say, those three spheres of family, church, state, they are all interconnected, and the church and the state are supposed to be supporting the family and supporting.
GuestJust having strong families.
GuestAnd unfortunately, I think we could argue.
GuestI mean, I've just argued that the state doesn't do a very good job of supporting families, but I think we could also point out a lot of ways that the church is also not supporting strong families.
GuestSometimes they.
GuestI mean, I've seen examples where pastors, sessions, church leadership is allowing one of the parties to divorce, and then they don't.
GuestThey don't penalize them.
GuestThey don't.
GuestThey don't discipline them or bar them from the supper or excommunicate them eventually is what they should do if they don't repent.
GuestAnd instead they'll just allow divorce.
GuestI mean, I've seen.
GuestI've seen this, and you probably heard of situations like this.
GuestWell, and so, I mean, this is a problem is, you know, when the state's not doing its job, that's bad enough.
GuestBut the church needs to stand on the scriptures, and they shouldn't just be allowing a party to divorce a Christian to divorce their spouse or a fellow christian spouse is often the case when there's no biblical grounds.
GuestRight.
GuestThere should be.
GuestIt should be justified in the traditional protestant position.
GuestI realize some people disagree with this, but the traditional protestant position, which is found in the Westminster standards, is it has to be adultery or abandonment.
GuestAnd so anyway, all that is to say, I mean, and this is just in the divorce issue, there's also other things.
GuestThe church isn't always preaching male headship.
GuestIt's not always preaching.
GuestPastors aren't always preaching for wives to submit to their husbands.
GuestAnd so they're almost like, you know, they may.
GuestThey may give lip service to male headship, but then they're essentially encouraging egalitarian practice, which is contrary to God's design.
GuestAnd then, of course, so what you end up with is that causes problems.
GuestAnd so in that way, the church, and often many churches, unfortunately today, are just straight up egalitarian and teaching egalitarianism.
GuestSo all of that undermines the family.
GuestAnd so the family is kind of left often on it on its own.
GuestI mean, there's some good churches doing a good job here, but the family's often left like, it's just up to husband and wife, and hopefully they do a good job.
GuestAnd if they don't, things fall apart, and then the church might not, might or might not help them, and the state probably isn't going to help them at all.
GuestSo all that is to say is that this three spheres should be working together.
GuestThe family is foundational, but we basically have the disintegration of the family.
GuestI mean, there's lots of people that talk about this, right?
GuestThat the family's kind of falling apart.
GuestThe american family, at least we can say, is rather weak, but then that ends up affecting church and state.
GuestSo it's kind of this, you know, it's reciprocal in the sense that, okay, the state and the church harm the family.
GuestThe family breaks down, but then that ends up leading to a weaker church and a weaker state, because those people go into politics or church leadership, or there's a lack of church leadership.
GuestRight.
GuestYou know, suitable candidates.
GuestSo anyway, that was kind of a long answer, but all of that kind of goes hand in hand.
Will SpencerYeah, the pieces all fit together.
Will SpencerThat answer is great.
Will SpencerI mean, I think a lot of people listening can see these things reflected in their own lives.
Will SpencerYou can see that the male rule in the home, the value of the family and marriage itself, and even human life and abortion has been undermined.
Will SpencerAnd what we have now, which many men that I know have been experiencing, is they have the divorce industry, the meat grinder that just grinds men down, that enables women to claim, without justification, things like abuse and to deprive dads of their children.
Will SpencerThat's a whole big thing.
Will SpencerI know that David Edgington talks about the abusive wife he's having a lot of men flocking to him who have been sharing their stories of the ways that they've been actually impacted by the way that the family court system has been weaponized against men.
Will SpencerAnd I think the frustrating thing is all of those things can be true, and they're terrible for what they are, but that the church seems to turn a blind eye to all of it.
Will SpencerYou know, I know a man, he was married for 20 years, had, I think, three sons, four sons with his wife.
Will SpencerThey were married, and she decided that she was just going to peace out of the faith.
Will SpencerShe's done with this whole Christianity thing, you know, dropped a.
Will SpencerDropped a surprise divorce on her husband, you know, and instantly, she gets half, you know, and actually ends up being closer to 60%.
Will SpencerAnd his church didn't do anything about it, and she just decides she's going to go to another church that's just going to be like, oh, yeah, that's cool.
Will SpencerYeah, sure.
Will SpencerYou just destroyed your family for no reason at all because you decided you didn't want to submit to your husband anymore and how common this is and how the church is supposed to be the backstop for this.
Will SpencerIt's supposed to be far more than that.
Will SpencerBut I think men have a right to expect that a patriarchal religion, very obviously, if you read scripture like, Christianity, would speak up for them.
Will SpencerI mean, obviously, hold them accountable for sin.
Will SpencerDon't give them carte blanche to sin themselves.
Will SpencerThat's not what I mean.
Will SpencerBut to say that, like, hey, this is what the book says, and you're a minister of the word.
Will SpencerWhat's going on?
Will SpencerAnd they just kind of, like, shrug their shoulders and like, well, you know, and it's frustrating for men who feel like their own churches should be standing up for them and simply aren't.
GuestYeah, well, I'm frustrated by it, and I'm a minister myself, but, I mean, there are exceptions out there.
GuestObviously.
GuestThere are good pastors.
GuestThere are good churches.
GuestBut, yeah, I think this is a huge problem.
GuestAnd, I mean, some of this is unavoidable in the sense of we have different denominations, we have a lot of independent churches, and people could.
GuestPeople can either be deceitful, like, they can just.
GuestThey could get excommunicated at their church.
GuestThey can go to another church and just not mention it.
GuestI mean, that's possible.
GuestOr more likely, though.
GuestAnd the unfortunate thing is that more likely that that church just doesn't care.
GuestYou know, they just, they don't care that another church excommunicated them.
GuestThey don't even know, like excommunication.
GuestWell, we never do that.
Will SpencerOh my goodness.
GuestRight.
GuestSo, I mean, this happens, unfortunately, is there's, so if we were to identify the problem, it's, there's a lack of discipline in the church.
GuestAnd I mean, this, I mean, discipline starts with the preaching of the word.
GuestSo you have to have faithful preaching because the idea is, right, you're calling people to repentance on a regular basis to obedience to God.
GuestAnd so that should be, that's kind of your like first line of defense.
GuestBut when people don't do that and then they commit flagrant sins, right.
GuestIt's the public stuff or scandalous sinse.
GuestAnd then they need to be censured, they need to be rebuked, you know, by, I mean, we have this in like Matthew 18, right?
GuestYou go, if somebody sins against you, your brother, you go talk to him and rebuke him.
GuestIf he doesn't listen, you go to two or, you know, bring two or three, and then if he doesn't listen, that you go, you take it to the church.
GuestAnd so the church would be going to the session.
GuestYou go to your church leadership.
GuestI mean, Presbyterians, we call it sessions the elders.
GuestBut whatever your church leadership is, and they should, they should be taking up discipline against the person.
GuestI mean, they could start with just talking to the person about it, but when the person refuses, then they can go through their courts.
GuestWe have church courts.
GuestMaybe people don't always realize this, but at least, like the Presbyterians is how we do things.
GuestWe have ecclesiastical courts, and so we can do censures, we can charge the person with an offense.
GuestAnd so let's say, you know, it could be like abandonment, right?
GuestThey're divorcing their spouse.
GuestWe would say, well, that's, you're abandoning your spouse.
GuestYou don't have warrant to do that, assuming there's no warrant.
GuestAnd so, you know, the church should be bringing discipline, and that would start with rebuke, and then it would move to suspension from the sacraments.
GuestRight.
GuestYou know, you don't go to excommunication right away.
GuestYou're trying to be patient with people to repent of.
GuestYeah, but eventually, if they're refusing to repent, contumacious is the word that's sometimes used, contumacy.
GuestThey refuse to repent.
GuestThey're hardened in their sin.
GuestThen you excommunicate them.
GuestAnd that's just right.
GuestWe see that in the Bible.
GuestI mean, this principle is there like one corinthians five, at least amongst other places, you deliver them to Satan.
GuestI mean, the hope is they repent.
GuestBut that's actually part of the discipline process is you have to cast them out of the church and say your sin is unacceptable, it's unbecoming of a Christian.
GuestYou can't do it and remain a part of the church.
GuestAnd so we visibly, as part of the visible church, you are no longer communicating with us.
GuestCommunicating, you're excommunicated.
GuestSo all that is to say there should be a discipline in the church.
GuestAnd especially for things like unjustified divorce, that would be called abandonment.
GuestI mean, and this, this isn't limited to women, right?
GuestIt would apply to men or women doing the same, a man or woman doing the same thing or, you know, committing adultery or whatever sin it is, whatever flagrant sin there is taking place, there should be discipline against it.
GuestIt just seems, though, that there's, I mean, I've seen this in some cases, I mean, it's a small sample size, so I can't, I can't extrapolate it everywhere.
GuestBut I, from talking to other people, it does seem to be that this is primarily a problem with women because I do think it's more common if a man was to, a christian man is to just leaves his wife.
GuestThe church is going to, you know, more likely than not to lay down the hammer.
GuestBut when a woman does it, they can, they can, I don't know, they sometimes justify it or they have some basis as well.
GuestYou know, she said that her husband was abusive.
GuestOkay, well, was this physical abuse?
GuestDid she call the police?
GuestI mean, when those things aren't, aren't the case, which, you know, that's usually not the case when this is going on.
GuestI mean, if the police are involved, that's a different story.
GuestBut when we're just saying like spiritual abuse or this loose definition, and then they kind of let it go.
GuestRight?
GuestThat's, that seems to be the case, is there's this practice where the churches are just, they're like overlooking things because, well, the wife, you know, gives some basis for why she's doing what she's doing.
GuestAnd a lot of times it's like emotionally manipulative, really.
GuestI mean, that the pastors and elders are being manipulated by women.
GuestSo this is really, I mean, messed up, right?
GuestI mean, it shouldn't be working this way.
GuestYeah.
GuestThe pastors and elders should be objective.
GuestNeutral arbiters in these, in these things.
GuestAnd so it should be fair, you know, whether it's the husband or wife that's abandoning the spouse, they should, they should be put under discipline.
GuestSo this seems to be, from what I understand, talking to others as well, seems to be there's this particular problem with women doing this.
GuestChristian women, some of them maybe leave the faith, but sometimes they just are just going to a different church or whatever, or they stay at the same church.
GuestI mean, kind of crazy.
GuestAnd the pastors don't do anything.
GuestElders don't do anything.
GuestBut so that raises the question, though, you know, what are we to make of churches that aren't disciplining people for flagrant sins like obvious sins?
GuestRight.
GuestWell, I mean, you look at the reformers and that the reform, the reformed tradition, the protestant tradition, you know, they ask, well, what are the marks of a church?
GuestWell, the marks are, you know, the faithful preaching of the word and the right administration of the sacraments.
GuestAnd then sometimes you hear the third one, which is the proper administration, discipline.
GuestBut really, the thing is, you know, if you, you don't even necessarily need to name that one because that falls under the sacrament.
GuestRight?
GuestIf we just say baptism and, sorry, the preaching of the word.
GuestThe right preaching of the word.
GuestRight.
GuestAdministration of sacraments.
GuestIf you're rightly administering the sacraments, then if someone's in open flagrant sin, then you should not be administering the sacraments to them.
GuestYou should be suspending them and then eventually excommunicating them from the sacraments.
GuestAnd that's the very language of excommunication.
GuestRight?
GuestCommunion of the Lord's supper.
GuestSo here's the really concerning part, is if a church is not properly or rightly administering the sacraments, then they are actually, they're not meeting one of the two marks of the church, which would mean that they're actually a false church.
GuestAnd so that's, I mean, this is a serious problem.
GuestAnd you see this in like, scripture uses the language of like, synagogues, of satan.
GuestYou know, you have, you have actual, like false churches.
GuestWe know there's false churches.
GuestI mean, the protestant consensus has been that Rome is a false church because they distort the gospel and their idolatry with the mass.
GuestIt's because they don't rightly administer the sacrament.
GuestSo if we're going to say that about Rome is, well, they get the sacraments so wrong that they're actually in the gospel, they're a false church.
GuestI mean, what does that say about kind of modern evangelicalism.
GuestI think you have a lot of false churches within the, within evangelicalism today.
GuestI mean, I'm not gonna, I can't know on an individual basis, but I'm just saying like, I think that's pretty obvious.
GuestIf we have churches that are either distorting the gospel or it doesn't have to be that they could be preaching justification by faith or something, but then they turn around and they're not doing any church discipline for flagrant sins.
GuestThen according to the traditional reform position, I think we say traditional protestant position, they're actually a false church.
Will SpencerThat's right.
Will SpencerThat's right.
Will SpencerI want to flip to the back of the book.
Will SpencerYou probably would remember the quote faster than I would be able to find it.
Will SpencerBut you make the point that what good is it to have reformed all these different aspects of the church if we're not reforming our impact on culture?
Will SpencerAnd that seems to be the most striking aspect of the book, is like, okay, reformed our soteriology and all of, and that's, and then praise God.
Will SpencerAnd you know, there is a particular blind spot that we have in our culture today.
Will SpencerAnd when I've had these conversations with many women, they will say very rightly that there have been situations of church abuse which I think we could probably rightly and truly call abuse.
Will SpencerBut I think the response that the church has had a, is rather than saying, okay, we're not going to do that anymore and we're going to hold a bolt.
Will SpencerWe're going to hold both to a standard.
Will SpencerThey've just kind of said, you know what we're going to do instead?
Will SpencerWe're going to hold both men and women to a low standard or a no standard to make up for past excesses.
Will SpencerAnd that seems to be, seems to have created a particular blind spot where, okay, long before I was born, there was probably abuses happening in church that probably still are today.
Will SpencerBut the existence of those abuses or those excesses does not itself justify overlooking excesses on the other side.
Will SpencerAnd that, I think, is the unique aspect of our moment is that, okay, we have to make up for those other abuses by being blind to a completely different category of abuse.
Will SpencerAnd somehow these scales will even out.
Will SpencerAnd I just don't, I mean, I don't think that that washes, but that seems to be the posture that many churches have like, well, the christian church screwed up in all these other ways in the past.
Will SpencerSo now we're just going to let everyone have kind of a free for all, but it's actually serving to make things worse?
GuestYeah, I mean, that makes no sense on really any level.
GuestBecause.
GuestBecause, I mean, if you're practicing injustice now, then on what basis could you even say prior generations were practicing injustice or abuse?
GuestYou know, practicing abuse?
GuestSo it's a.
GuestThat's just kind of crazy, is.
GuestI mean, I would challenge the idea that there was widespread abuse in marriage and the like, prior to the feminist movement or something.
GuestI wouldn't agree with that.
GuestBut, like, even if we were to grant that, well, then the solution would be we should just seek to follow God's word properly now, and I.
GuestAnd follow just practices.
GuestSo, yeah, this idea of justifying injustice because of past abuses is.
GuestWell, it's actually just unjust.
GuestSo there's really no other way.
GuestOther way to put it.
Will SpencerSo, yeah, it's just unjust in the opposite.
Will SpencerIt's unjust in the opposite direction.
Will SpencerAnd that seems to be the whole thrust of wokeness.
Will SpencerJust in general, this straw man is built of excesses and abuses in the past.
Will SpencerAnd so in order to right those excesses, we allow them in the opposite direction.
Will SpencerAnd that's not justice at all.
Will SpencerBut that seems to soothe, not in any good way, a particular longing, perhaps, for revenge.
Will SpencerAnd I think that's the spirit that underlies a lot of this.
Will SpencerAnd I can understand, not to excuse it, but I can understand how people in the secular world would think that way.
Will SpencerI can understand the victor victim kind of cycle, which might be one of the only things ever to come out of psychology that's any good, is to understand the ways that victors become the victims.
Will SpencerAnd that cycle goes around and around.
Will SpencerBut within the christian church, that that seems to have been swallowed and digested from self professing christians is something that's quite odd.
Will SpencerThis idea that we have to welcome in the marginalized and give them power to then exert their own agenda, and somehow that writes the scales of history.
Will SpencerI think that's anti biblical.
Will SpencerThere's an objective standard that we're all accountable to, but it's something that has flowed in probably through the very same feminist doors that you articulate, opened and opened in this book, and probably through theological liberalism as well.
GuestYeah, I mean, even when you look at, like, feminism, they're not advocating actual equality.
GuestI mean, I would reject what they're wanting anyway, which would be functional equality.
GuestAnd, I mean, scripture doesn't teach that actually teaches that the husband has authority.
GuestI mean, while it affirms equality and being right and worse between men and women.
GuestSo.
GuestBut, yeah, I mean, you see that now is.
GuestIt's.
GuestI mean, feminism wants essentially female dominance.
GuestI think that's often the case.
Will SpencerSo, yeah, yeah.
Will SpencerJust real quick, I want to get back into the book.
Will SpencerA couple more questions.
Will SpencerBut one of the things I wanted to mention is there was a thread going around on Twitter about female toxic femininity, and could someone please provide examples of toxic femininity?
Will SpencerAnd so I replied to that, and somewhere down the thread, I was able to say, well, when we look at the examples of male heroes, the component of male heroism is never like, haha, I won over the women.
Will SpencerBut when you look at female heroes and media today, one of their components is always like, I put down those silly men.
Will SpencerAnd so you can see in that there is an element of this isn't just about equality, it's actually about supremacy.
GuestYeah, absolutely.
GuestI see that same thing.
Will SpencerIt's hard to miss, and it's becoming, I don't know that it's actually popular, but it's trendy, let's say.
Will SpencerSo to get back into the book, one of the things that you did, I kind of see the book as being divided into three sections.
Will SpencerIn a way.
Will SpencerYou have the reformers within the home, and then you kind of bring it into the commonwealth, as you said.
Will SpencerBut then you also talk a little bit about where things are in the evangelical church and some of the particular leaders, in particular Tim Keller and his wife, who have maybe they played a central role in letting some of these ideas in.
Will SpencerAnd I found that to be the most shocking part of the book.
Will SpencerBut before we get there, I want to talk a little bit about female rule in the commonwealth, because you mentioned the difference between Calvin and Knox, which I thought was really interesting.
Will SpencerMaybe we can talk a little bit about that for the moment, because we've talked about in the home.
Will SpencerAnd so now let's bring it into the commonwealth, and then we'll take a look at what's going on in the church.
GuestYeah, so, I mean, Knox has his.
GuestI mentioned this earlier, the first trumpet blast against the monstrous regiment of women.
GuestAnd he writes this.
GuestHe actually writes it anonymously at first.
GuestAnd this is against Bloody Mary because she's queen and she's Roman Catholic, but she's persecuting Protestants.
GuestShe's killing Protestants.
GuestAnd so, I mean, hence the name she earned, bloody Maryland.
GuestBut when Knox writes his short treatise, he doesn't just attack her.
GuestAnd he doesn't just say, well, women generally shouldn't rule.
GuestHe actually says that female rule is illegitimate.
GuestHe attacks it entirely.
GuestHe's attacking just the idea of women rulers at all.
GuestNow, this becomes a problem because Mary dies, and then Elizabeth comes to power, and she's a Protestant.
GuestSo, I mean, I think Mary was only alive for, like, four years.
GuestI think that's right.
GuestQueen for four years.
GuestSo that's kind of the context of what happened there.
GuestAnd Elizabeth is not happy with John Knox.
GuestI mean, Knox is scottish, but that was under the monarchy at the time.
GuestSo Calvin was not happy about Knox's treatise, the first blast, because he actually writes, and I have it in there, basically, Knox had asked him once, like, in private about this issue, and Calvin didn't see what Knox wrote immediately.
GuestBut once he finds out about it, he was not happy.
GuestAnd partly because it's not that he did disagree with Knox in part, and I'll explain that.
GuestBut the bigger issue, I think, was Knox caused trouble for basically the reformers because I think it was published in Geneva.
GuestAnd so Queen Elizabeth was upset.
GuestI.
GuestShe was upset with Calvin and Beza, and they, of course, aren't pleased with this situation.
GuestSo though they weren't, they weren't in England, but just relations with England.
GuestSo all that is to say Calvin, and you see this in letters between him and also Bollinger and Beza, those guys all said that female rule should not be ordinary.
GuestSo they weren't, you know, happy about having queens.
GuestThey didn't think it was this great thing.
GuestThey just didn't think it was illegitimate.
GuestSo they didn't go as far as Knox.
GuestBut, you know, you can see this in, like, Calvin's.
GuestI mean, you could just.
GuestI have it in there, but you can go read, like, his commentary on one Timothy two.
GuestAnd he actually applies that, you know, prohibition on women teaching in the church.
GuestHe applies that to Commonwealth.
GuestAnd he just says, like, you know, the female power rule has always been considered a monstrous thing.
GuestSo, I mean, he's got even pretty strong language against this as well.
GuestSo that's why I say, like, his view isn't that different from Calvin.
GuestIt's not like he thought women rulers were good.
GuestI mean, all of these guys, if they were looking at our society today, would say, yeah, something's really out of whack.
GuestI mean, you know, you're pushing 50% or even, like, higher.
GuestYou know, majorities of your leaders are women.
GuestThat's.
GuestThat's not just some, like, Deborah situation where there's, like, you know, where she was a judge.
GuestI mean, I qualify that some.
GuestI get in that some of the differences there in masculine Christianity with her.
GuestBut, yes, but, you know, we can at least grant.
GuestOkay, there's occasional female rulers.
GuestYou know, that's.
GuestThat's.
GuestIt happens sometimes.
GuestThey do a decent job, but that's not the issue.
GuestThe question is, what's God's design for leadership?
GuestShould women be leading?
GuestAnd I think the traditional reform position, consensus, the minimum, at least, is that, well, it shouldn't be ordinary.
GuestJust as men are the leaders in the home and definitely are leaders in the church, in the civil realm, they should ordinarily.
GuestShould ordinarily be men.
GuestBut.
GuestBut sometimes things did happen right, where, you know, you would have a queen.
GuestI mean, they weren't.
GuestWe have to remember, like, they weren't.
GuestThey weren't elected.
GuestIt's because there was, you know, the queen's married to the king, or there's no.
GuestThere's no male heir.
GuestI mean, sometimes that was part of the problem.
GuestSo.
GuestSo anyway, so a little different situation.
GuestIt wasn't, you know, a democracy or something where they're electing female.
GuestFemale leaders.
Will SpencerSo was John Knox's book, was that inspired by Mary's brutality, or was it a posture that he had already held?
Will SpencerWas it, like, I have to write this now, and to assert that female leaders are unjust because she's persecuting Protestants?
Will SpencerOr was this just something that he already believed that the circumstances gave him the opportunity to write?
GuestI don't know how much he knew or thought about women leaders before he wrote that, but I think it's fair to say he probably thought what he thought before he wrote it, but he decided, well, Mary, she's awful, and I need to blast her.
GuestAnd so that's what he did.
GuestAnd I think it's just, that's where his theology came out.
Will SpencerOkay.
Will SpencerSo it gave him sort of an urgency in his occasion to express this, and so that's to be distinguished from men like Calvin and like Luther that thought that there were extraordinary circumstances where women could lead in the commonwealth, but it certainly wasn't ordinary.
Will SpencerIt wasn't to be sought, it wasn't to be celebrated.
Will SpencerIt was perhaps remedial versus.
Will SpencerJohn Knox was like, no, never, under any circumstances.
GuestYeah, he said, it's illegitimate.
GuestYeah.
GuestSo he went.
GuestHe went a step further.
GuestYeah.
Will SpencerBut, I mean, I guess that makes a little sense.
Will SpencerThat makes sense given the circumstances.
Will SpencerSo, as you were investigating the reformers, I meant to ask you this a little bit earlier.
Will SpencerDid you find anything that these men said about these ideas that surprised you?
Will SpencerThey were like, oh, like a particular clarity that was relevant to today or anything that was like, oh, I wouldn't have expected they thought this way about it.
GuestYeah, that's a good question.
GuestI, I mean, I guess at least maybe just how well they address the issues.
GuestI think, I think they really have good counsel.
GuestI mean, just even the words, I mean, I don't know.
GuestYou know, look, the older writers are always going to get accused by modern standards of being sexist, but you go, you go read, you go read them.
GuestAnd, you know, they obviously thought highly of women.
GuestThey weren't trying to keep women down.
GuestI mean, so none that surprises me.
GuestBut to see it drawn out, you know, it's pretty standard to, like, speak of a husband's wife as his counselor, advisor and those kind of things.
GuestSo, you know, I don't really know how you would, the, the feminists would fit that with their paradigm because they weren't saying like, oh, yeah, we don't care what women think.
GuestYou shouldn't even ask them their opinions.
GuestNo, that's not how they approach things.
GuestThey just thought, well, the husband's the head of his household and so he had ultimate responsibility and duties.
GuestBut, yeah, I mean, they're, they're, they affirm, like, equality between men and women in a sense.
GuestRight.
GuestI mean, which we would all do is, I mean, they even use this language of, and there was that Matthew Henry quotes it, but it was from some earlier theologians where they say Eve was not taken from Adam's head or feet, but from his heart.
GuestRight.
GuestSo he doesn't trample her, but, but she, you know, there's a nearness in equality with her.
GuestSo, you know, they say things like that.
GuestIt's pretty standard.
GuestSo, I mean, yeah, I think feminists, you know, would probably be tripped up by some of this stuff if they actually read it.
Will SpencerCan't be bothered.
Will SpencerYeah, I thought the consistency, I think the number, the number of times that you, that, that different reformers quoted that same sentiment, that she wasn't taken from Adam's head to rule over him or from his feet to be trampled under him, but from his side to be next to him.
Will SpencerThere were at least three or four different reformers who said the same thing.
Will SpencerMaybe they all got it from one of their predecessors.
Will SpencerBut I thought that was a very beautiful and moving sentiment that speaks exactly to the, like, look, headship is a thing, but headship and submission doesn't mean subjugation.
Will SpencerAnd that's, of course, the feminists jump right into the, this is all about subjugation.
Will SpencerDitch and overlook the notion that this is supposed to be a loving bond of equality in one sense, but leadership in another sense.
Will SpencerAnd how much Holmes need that?
Will SpencerBecause I don't think that they could make the case that our leaderless homes today are doing better than they ever have at any point in history.
Will SpencerThe joke that I've been making is that real feminism has never been tried, of course.
Will SpencerBut maybe if they investigated the reformers, as you did, they would see, particularly in the church, that this is a far more loving bond than perhaps they want to interpret it as.
GuestYeah, absolutely.
GuestI mean, we've got that quote about you being taken from the rib, but also just the duties.
GuestWell, scriptural duties from the Lord.
GuestBut they preach these to men and women.
GuestAnd so, I mean, they.
GuestHave.
GuestYou read Goodge, for example, William Goodge.
GuestI mean, he's got hard words for wives, but he also has hard words for husbands and being gentle with their wives.
GuestAnd it's one, Peter, three.
GuestSo, yeah, I mean, it's just.
GuestIt's all balanced.
GuestThey're just wise, and it's good, good application from scripture.
GuestAnd I think, really, anybody would benefit from, you know, reading the quotations I provide in the book.
GuestBut then you can also use that to jump off and go read, you know, the original sources.
GuestIf you'd like to read more.
GuestI mean, like I said, you could googe.
GuestAnd, yeah, I think, you know, just when we contrast.
GuestWhen we contrast, like, older culture, christian culture, compared to, like, what we have today, I mean, okay, everybody, every culture has always had problems.
GuestThere's always been divorce and adultery and all these, you know, sins.
GuestBut, you know, who had a.
GuestWho had healthier marriages?
GuestI mean, we have some very healthy marriages today.
GuestBut, like, overall, I mean, you look at our divorce rates and all these things.
GuestI mean, I don't know when you have a nation where, like, 40% of the children are born outside of marriage.
GuestI mean, and then the divorce rates.
GuestI don't even know what the divorce rate is.
GuestIt's just high.
GuestI know that.
GuestI don't know.
GuestI don't know how you say that.
GuestWell, we've got a better grasp on marriage today.
GuestNo, no, we don't.
Will SpencerI'm sorry.
GuestJust don't.
Will SpencerYou mentioned Guj, and so I marked this page.
Will SpencerIt's sort of an extended quote, if I may.
Will SpencerRead it real quick.
Will SpencerGood recognizes on page, I think it says, this is 25.
Will SpencerGoodge recognized that some wives must have their own will and must command not only children and her servants, but husbands also, he added, quote, if a husband be a man of courageous and seek to stand upon his right and maintain his authority by requiring obedience of his wife.
Will SpencerStrange it is to behold what a hurly burly she will make in the house.
Will SpencerBut if he be a milksop and basely yield unto his wife and suffer her to rule, then it may be those there shall be some outward quiet.
Will SpencerThe ground of hereof is an ambitious and proud humor in women who must needs rule, or else they think themselves slaves.
Will SpencerAnd I thought that was a pretty powerful picture in a way.
Will SpencerIn some sense, the things that the reformers are dealing with.
Will SpencerSin is not new.
Zach GarrisIt's not a new invention.
Will SpencerAnd to look into the past and to see, I mentioned earlier, David Edgington and the abusive wife.
Will SpencerSo many men in his book and his practice, they try to lead righteously, and the response is to have a big hurly burly made about it, as if it's slavery.
Will SpencerIt's like, well, no, that's not the case at all, as we've been saying.
GuestYeah, I'll continue to quote for you because it gets even more controversial.
Will SpencerPlease.
GuestHe says, but in doing so, the women who react this way, he says, assuredly herein, they thwart God's ordinance, pervert the order of nature, deface the image of Christ, overthrow the ground of all duty, hinder the good of the family, become an ill pattern to children and servants, lay themselves open to Satan and incur many other mischiefs which cannot but follow upon the violating of this main duty of obedience, which, if it be not performed, how can other duties be expected?
GuestSo that's kind of where I was saying, you know, Gooch has some.
GuestSome strong words for people, but in this case, he's.
GuestThat's the feminist spirit.
GuestHe's.
GuestHe's saying, you know, this is.
GuestThis is just what God calls you to do.
GuestAnd if you don't obey God in this matter, if wives won't submit to their husbands, on what basis are they going to do, you know, other.
GuestFulfill other duties and.
GuestAnd practice other christian virtues?
GuestSo, I mean, that's why this stuff matters, right?
GuestI mean, the Bible's pretty clear on male headship, wifely submission, and it's just as clear as that you should, you know, practice patience and be loving and these kind of things.
GuestSo, I mean, if I don't know how we can just divide things and throw.
GuestI mean, obviously, I'm familiar with egalitarian arguments.
GuestI tried to dismantle them in masculine Christianity, but, you know, I just.
GuestIf you're gonna throw one out, you're probably throwing other things out.
Will SpencerSo that's a great opportunity to segue into the third, I was gonna say the third half of the book, but really the third section of the book, which is about the Kellers and Nancy Pearcey's toxic war on masculinity.
Will SpencerSo maybe we can talk a little bit about that, because you had mentioned jokingly, I don't know how they make.
Will SpencerHow they square these two things.
Will SpencerIt's like, well, here are some pretty significant leaders who identify themselves with the reformed tradition, who have been doing just that.
Will SpencerLike the section about the Kellers, I was like, I couldn't read.
Will SpencerMy hand was over my face.
Will SpencerLike, what am I watching right now with some of the things that were being written there?
Will SpencerSo let's talk about that, because that was, of course, we're having this conversation a couple days after Ray Ortland had tweeted about his support for Kamala Harris and never Trump.
Will SpencerAnd, of course, we all have misinterpreted that.
Will SpencerObviously.
Will SpencerObviously, we had misinterpreted a six word tweet, but it's up right now.
Will SpencerSo maybe we can talk a bit about that last section.
GuestYeah, absolutely.
GuestI mean, we can maybe just preface this by saying that, you know, many of the leaders in the church have done a poor job in, well, a variety of areas, but feminism being one of them, or male.
GuestMale headship, I think I spend, like, 15 pages on the Kellers, you know, which is unfortunate.
GuestI mean, Tim Keller was, you know, he passed away last year.
GuestI mean, he's been very influential in the PCA, my denomination.
GuestI'm some same denomination he was.
GuestAnd just even outside of, really, even the reformed world.
GuestAnd Tim Keller's gotten a lot of criticism for a number of things, but I haven't seen a lot of criticism on this issue.
GuestIn fact, I've seen some people praise his wife's booklet, which I get into in there, which is Jesus justice and gender roles.
GuestIt's very short, published by Sondervin, so that maybe will tell you where it's coming from, which, you know, Sonderin's not very conservative, not anymore.
GuestSo, yeah, I mean, you can ask me specific things in here, but I think, yeah, the Kellers were very narrow.
GuestThey held to a very narrow complementarianism.
GuestIn fact, I wouldn't even.
GuestI mean, I don't love the term complementarianism for various reasons, one of which is that, you know, that that would put their view in the same camp broadly as, I mean, maybe mine, if you wanted to call me a complementarian.
GuestI mean, I like.
GuestI said, I generally don't like that term.
GuestBut you've had that distinction between, like, broader and narrow complementarianism.
GuestBut yeah, I mean, they're almost at, like, egalitarianism.
GuestBut yeah.
GuestGo ahead.
Will SpencerWell, so for the listeners who don't know the difference between broad and narrow complementarianism, maybe to even contrast it with egalitarianism and patriarchy help because those two terms in particular, like, what do they mean in the context of this discussion?
GuestYeah.
GuestWell, let's start with, like, the traditional reform view, which is what I'm advocating.
GuestThe book, which some people would call patriarchy, just male rule.
GuestIt's God designed mental rule.
GuestAnd so that would be in the home, church and Commonwealth.
GuestThat would fit some complementarians who would say they are broad complementarians.
GuestBut maybe what will help explain that is the narrow complementarians, where they.
GuestI don't know if they use this term for themselves, but it got used for them, which is that, I mean, to be a complementarian, you had to affirm.
GuestThis was in the 1980s, then into 1990s, you had this rise of the complementarian movement.
GuestIt was really a reaction against egalitarianism or christian feminism, which was denying male headship, you know, at all.
GuestIn the home or church, they wanted women pastors and mutual, mutual submission, they call it in the home.
GuestIt's kind of crazy.
GuestSo complementarianism came in and said, no, no, no, we affirm male leadership in the home.
GuestWe affirm, you know, only.
GuestOnly men can be pastors and elders in the church.
GuestAnd that's good.
GuestThose are good things to affirm.
GuestBut the problem is how that got played out, how these things were applied and then kind of some compromise in between.
GuestSo, for example, some people calling themselves complementarians, they wouldn't let women hold the office of pastor elder, but they would let women.
GuestI mean, you have this actually a lot.
GuestThere's a lot of guys who do.
GuestThey still let women teach Sunday school.
GuestYou know, they can.
GuestWell, they can teach men in other settings.
GuestOkay.
GuestBut.
GuestBut, you know, some of them, the worst offenders would say, well, women can actually preach as long as it's under the authority of the session.
GuestRight.
GuestBecause they can't be the pastor, but they can preach.
GuestI mean, no, I don't think that makes any sense, but.
GuestAnd I have various reasons for it with some of which I get into the book.
GuestBut, you know, I'll just mention one here is like, first Timothy two says, I do not permit a woman to teach or exercise authority over man.
GuestSo the prohibition is on teaching.
GuestIt's not even limited to preaching, and it's not on the office.
GuestSo you have a broad prohibition that women aren't to teach scripture to men.
GuestAnd I argue that that's like a public aspect, not a one on one conversation or something.
GuestSo anyway, so I don't think it makes sense.
GuestBut that's the narrow complementarian position.
GuestNow, the Kellers never said that they allowed, that they would allow women to preach, but I don't think they really put the brakes on that.
GuestIn other words, I think the very things that they said in that Cathy Keller's booklet argues, I think it would allow that for that position, though they didn't say that that's what they held.
GuestBut I do know.
GuestI mean, and I dug this up, and I have footnotes on it, so if people want to see my research, they can find it.
GuestIt's all backed up for Timothy Keller, I had to find stuff that was, like, audio.
GuestYou know, it's.
GuestHe didn't write a whole lot on this.
GuestHis wife has that booklet.
GuestBut I mean, basically, I can just tell you they agreed.
GuestHe clearly was fine with everything she wrote in that booklet, and.
GuestWhich, which would make sense.
GuestSo basically, he allowed women to teach theology courses in their church to Mendez.
GuestMixed groups, even.
GuestI think they had one exception.
GuestHe said it's like, not their, like, I think they call it, like, catechet humans class.
GuestSo basically, they're new members, but, yeah, so that meant, like, in Keller's church, which is redeemer, New York, they.
GuestAnd I assume they're still doing this.
GuestThey were allowing women to teach.
GuestThey did a systematic theology course, or, I don't know, you're just going through the old testament or whatever in some Sunday school course, they got women teaching that.
GuestSo, I mean, that seems fairly egalitarian, but so, so that's the thing is, like, the narrow complementarian position is kind of like this compromise of sorts.
GuestIt's like a middle.
GuestI mean, it's kind of Tim Keller's thing is the third way ism.
GuestBut, yeah, so that's.
GuestThat's where they were.
GuestAnd I will mention you've seen my prediction here is people that really followed Keller on these things will.
GuestWill continue to go down a bad path.
GuestI think narrow complementarianism is very unstable.
GuestI mean, there's other issues we didn't get into, but, like, they don't tend to really tie the prohibition with nature, the difference between men and women.
GuestAnd so they kind of make the prohibitions to be, like, arbitrary.
GuestAnd so then if they're just arbitrary, then you don't really have a good reason.
GuestI mean, you have, you have God's command.
GuestI mean, that's a good enough reason.
GuestFollow it.
GuestBut it does help when we understand why he said what he did, why he placed prohibitions on us, which is.
GuestOh, well, he designed men to lead, and men are more suited for preaching and leadership and all these things.
GuestSo, yeah, so my prediction is that those who follow the Kellers on these points will continue to go down a path that leads them towards egalitarianism.
GuestAnd I think we've actually, I'll give some evidence of this.
GuestWe've seen some people do this.
GuestScott Sauls was a former PCA pastor, and he had some issues at his church.
GuestThere's some discipline.
GuestAnd he, instead of coming back into the PCA, he actually left and went to the eCO, the echo, which is evangelical covenant order.
GuestIt's actually an egalitarian Presbyterian denomination.
GuestHe was a kellerite.
GuestHe was a disciple of Keller.
GuestI mean, he talked about this.
GuestAnd so, and, yeah, we have to distinguish the echo from, like, the EPC.
GuestThe EPC has its majority egalitarian now, but actually allows, you know, you don't have to be an egalitarian there.
GuestBut that's not the case.
GuestIf you go to echo.
GuestIf you go to Echo, you are an egalitarian, like you must affirm or, I guess, must deny male headship.
GuestSo, yeah, you've seen some guys from the PCA leave and go there.
GuestAnd I just, you know, it raises questions about what exactly did they believe when they were in the PCA?
GuestHow firmly did they actually hold male headship?
GuestI don't know.
GuestI mean, I can't answer those things.
GuestBut a couple of other examples.
GuestThe last couple years there's been a case in the PCA, in the New York metro presbytery, which is where Tim Keller was in Redeemer.
GuestThey planted a bunch of churches in that area, and there was a church that allowed a.
GuestI think she was an episcopal priest.
GuestThey allowed a woman, they clearly allowed a woman preacher.
GuestShe preached a sermon, I think.
GuestI don't know if it was her.
GuestI think she even administered the sacrament there, the supper.
GuestDon't quote me on that, but something happened.
GuestI think there was something with the supper, but I know she definitely preached.
GuestAnd so there was discipline.
GuestAnd part of the problem is the presbytery didn't have actually discipline.
GuestThe church that did that.
GuestSo that tells you something about the New York Metro presbytery.
GuestAnd then that went up to the General assembly so the General assembly, the higher court, is handling that, and now it's off to the standing judicial commission, which is like basically the Supreme Court of the PCA.
GuestSo that's still going on because the SJC didn't want to take it up.
GuestAnd if I remember correctly, I think the General assembly sent it back to the SJC.
GuestSo, but that's, that's still in process.
GuestSo that's, let's do what you will with that, but at least know that happened in the New York metro Presbyterian.
GuestAnd then actually, I've seen some.
GuestWell, this ties into another thing is, like, even in the PCA, there's a lot of churches that allow women to, they don't allow women to preach, but they'll allow women to lead other parts of worship.
GuestAnd I mean, like, I'm specifically referring to, like, leading some prayers.
GuestMaybe some even let them do the pastoral prayer, but don't call it that.
GuestI was not calling it the pastoral prayer if a woman's doing it.
GuestBut I know some will at least let women do some smaller prayers, shorter prayers in the service.
GuestAnd then probably the most common thing, and the Kellers used to do this all the time, or Tim Keller is they'd have women read scripture prior to the sermon.
GuestI mean, that's pretty common.
GuestIf you ever listen to a Tim Keller Sermon, that's almost seemed like the majority of the time of the sermons I've heard by him is they, he'd have a woman read his scripture text.
GuestNow I'm just going to say, I'm a preacher and I don't like anybody reading my text.
GuestI want to read my own text before I get up there.
GuestOne, it's just, you know, it's fresh on my mind.
GuestBut two, I might add something, explain something, or just, I want to read it the way I want to read.
GuestI want to make sure it's read well.
GuestAnd I'm best suited to do that because I prepped from it all week.
GuestSo there's just that principle.
GuestBut that being said, our church, in our liturgy, we do have other scripture readings and prayers and things like that, and we only let elders do that.
GuestSo it either has to be me or as the teaching elder, pastor or a ruling elder.
GuestI think along with the Westminster assembly, we'd make the exception of like a man who's training for the ministry.
GuestHe's an intern or he's a licentiate.
GuestHe might be licensed to preach by the Presbyterian.
GuestThat's fine.
GuestI think all that's good just keeping with the spirit of the pastors and elders doing these things and the scripture texts.
GuestI mean, the fact is you have entire, you have prohibitions on an entire class of people in the New Testament, and that would be on women.
GuestSo you have in one Timothy two, and then one corinthians 1434 and 35, which says, like, let the women be silent of the churches.
GuestSo, I mean, if you have these prohibitions on women as a class, that means women shouldn't be publicly speaking in church.
GuestThey shouldn't be teaching or exercising authority in the, over the congregation.
GuestSo, I mean, I think that's just pretty simple.
GuestThis is the reformed tradition.
GuestI give, I give quotes to back all this up, even though I'll even, I'll note even the Westminster larger catechism, which.
GuestThe PCA, it's part of our standards.
GuestI think it's one, it's 156.
GuestI'd have to look, says are all to read.
GuestIt's basically asking all to read in public worship.
GuestAnd the answer is it says, it says not all are to read.
GuestAnd it gives some qualification.
GuestNow, it doesn't say who's not to read.
GuestOkay.
GuestIt's not, it's not, like, explicit.
GuestI wish it were more explicit.
GuestBut what I show in there is the context that the Westminster assembly drafted other documents.
GuestAnd so their directory for worship, you can go there and it very clearly connects.
GuestAnd you see, ah, when they said all or not to read, they meant only ministers and those training for the ministry.
GuestSo they clearly didn't think women should be reading scripture in public worship.
GuestSo all that is to say, the Kellers, amongst others, have departed from the reformed tradition in this regard.
GuestAnd one thing I'm trying to do is call them back to consistency here.
GuestAnd I don't think it's good to have women leading, you know, in our worship services.
GuestBut there's kind of the spirit.
GuestI mean, we all see it and it's not limited to the PCA or anything.
GuestI mean, Wayne Grudem does this.
GuestTom Schreiner, you know, he's a Southern Baptist.
GuestI mean, I've got quotes from there and from them in here.
GuestAnd I think also masculine Christianity, where they're like, they're basically saying, you know, we, we obviously have to follow scripture, but, but we want to push women to as many positions as we can.
GuestAnd I'm like, oh, whoa, whoa.
GuestThat's, that's not what I'm getting from the Bible.
GuestYou know, the Bible has prohibitions, but it, you know, it certainly isn't saying we should push for these, these other things.
GuestPush the bot.
GuestPush the boundary as much as you can.
GuestNo, that's a very modern, like, spirit.
GuestThat's a very modern feminist spirit.
GuestAnd so I guess that's, that's just what I would say there is.
GuestLike, that's.
GuestThey're not getting this stuff from the Bible.
GuestI mean, I know someone might appeal to, like, first corinthians eleven five, which speaks of women praying and prophesying.
GuestI deal with that.
GuestThe reformers all dealt with that.
GuestI don't think it's permissive, certainly not a command.
GuestAnd it's.
GuestI raise questions about the context.
GuestI don't.
GuestI think it's about private or semi private situations, like a Bible study.
GuestI don't think it's talking about public worship.
GuestSo anyway, there's a whole host of issues there.
GuestBut yeah, just to wrap up, we were saying is the Kellers have been a driver behind pushing this narrow complementarianism.
Will SpencerAs you were talking about those things, I remember reading masculine Christianity and just getting a sense of how fine the people who are trying to bring feminism into the church, how fine they slice things.
Will SpencerIt's actually pretty remarkable the amount of brain power that must be applied to, like, well, how can we just shave off just a little bit?
Will SpencerLet's bring women into all these places where a plain reading of scripture explicitly prohibits that.
Will SpencerBut then you get, I think it's one corinthians eleven.
Will SpencerYou said, how much they hang on that one verse and that verse in context of everything else throughout all of the Bible.
Will SpencerYou can't say that, well, this is the little keyhole that we can squeeze things through, and yet they're trying.
Will SpencerAnd that was the thing that was.
Zach GarrisSo shocking to me, particularly in the.
Will SpencerSection about the Kellers, is that obviously there's a lot of, we'll call it scriptural wisdom there, but that seems to have been used to like, well, what can we cut off to enable things that otherwise any sensible person would look and be like?
Will SpencerThat's not allowed.
Will SpencerBut because of their scriptural wisdom, they knew exactly where to push.
Will SpencerAnd that's the troubling part to me.
GuestYeah, I think Bb Warfield, he got into as the old Princeton theologian, he got into that passage with one corinthians 14 and eleven, and he looks at eleven five by one, praying and prophesying.
GuestAnd he says, what this means, basically, I'm paraphrasing what this means.
GuestNobody really knows.
GuestAnd we're building up inference after inference when we start saying, well, oh, well, this means we should have women leading prayers and public worship.
GuestThat's what, it's one passage, one verse, not even a, it's not even really a passage.
GuestIt's like part of a passage, one verse phrase, and we're gonna, you know, run with it.
GuestI mean, that's, that's basically how christian egalitarians work is.
GuestThey find anything.
GuestThey find, you know, they go to Deborah and.
GuestWell, let's make Deborah normative.
GuestI mean, that's pretty much how their, you know, hermeneutics work.
GuestIt's not good.
GuestNobody does this with other stuff you shouldn't.
GuestIt's not a good practice.
GuestSo we don't take the less clear things, the muddy things, and build whole doctrines and practices on it.
GuestThat's a bad idea.
Will SpencerYeah, don't do that.
Will SpencerI remember in our first interview I asked you what the response had been to masculine Christianity.
Will SpencerYou gave a really good answer.
Will SpencerBut what has the response been to this book?
Will SpencerLike, as you've launched out there into the world, what's, what's the response been?
Will SpencerBroadly?
GuestYeah.
GuestWell, I'm a little concerned because I only seem to get positive feedback.
GuestSo I, my thought is probably that, you know, my, my critics or people who don't like this stuff aren't, they either aren't reading it.
GuestThat's probably the most common thing is they don't, they don't want to touch the stuff I write or they read it and I, I mean, this is what I would hope.
GuestThey read it and they go, oh, I'm not interacting with that.
GuestThat's just going to get me in trouble.
GuestAnd, I mean, that's kind of what I want.
GuestI want people to read my books and think that they can't refute it and that there's no reason to even try publicly and they're just going to look bad.
GuestSo in this case, I mean, I argue things, right?
GuestSo this book is an argument.
GuestIt is contrasting, like, the older reform theologians with the modern, modern church, modern reform leaders and whatnot.
GuestAnd one of the things that's trying to show is that we've departed from our reformed forefathers.
GuestI think that's obvious.
GuestI don't think that's debatable.
GuestBut what they would have to do, if you wanted to defend some sort of egalitarianism or narrow complementarianism, you would have to then take the position.
GuestIf you read my book, you'd have to say, well, they were all wrong.
GuestWho wants to do that?
GuestRight?
GuestWho wants to say Calvin, Vermegley, Knox, guj you know, down the line, Perkins, everybody, they were all wrong.
GuestThey just, I know they all agreed, but they, they all misinterpreted the Bible.
GuestThey all got it wrong, and we today are right.
GuestYou know, I mean, that's, that's kind of a crazy position.
GuestYou know, I say in the book, it's, it's always possible that the church is erred.
GuestBut I, you know, when that's, that's more likely when there's like very variance in views and.
GuestBut when you have like a consensus, especially, I mean, you, I mean, this book only gets in the reformers.
GuestI mean, you could also get into, I do get an American Presbyterian, some like the 18th, 19th century, which, you know, they're in line.
GuestI mean, then you could throw in the church fathers and you could probably go in the medieval church, and when everybody's saying the same thing and they're all in, like central agreement.
GuestLet's just put it this way.
GuestThe historical argument is not on the side of the feminists.
GuestSo anyway, to answer your question, I haven't received a lot of criticism.
GuestI mean, but, you know, in one sense, it's good.
GuestIt's less controversy on my part, but I hope, and I do think what I'm doing with my books honor thy father's masculine christianity, is I'm trying to feed the brethren.
GuestRight.
GuestI'm trying to build up the church and give them tools and weapons for proper doctrine, for fighting egalitarianism, for fighting against narrow complementarianism.
GuestAnd, yeah, I hope that's rallying the troops.
GuestThat's another thing is just kind of encouraging, encouraging the brethren.
GuestSo that's what I hope my books, even these interviews are doing, and just kind of get this stuff into other people's hands.
Will SpencerI want to be respectful of your time, but I did have one more question, if you've got a minute.
GuestAbsolutely.
Will SpencerSo I wonder.
Will SpencerNow, I don't want to spoil it, but it's one of my favorite parts of the book was the seven step process for feminization.
Will SpencerAnd speaking of encouraging the brethren, I wonder if you could.
Will SpencerI want people to read the book.
Will SpencerIt's at the end of the book.
Will SpencerIt's completely worth it to read the whole book.
Will SpencerExactly.
Will SpencerBut without giving it away, maybe you can talk a little bit about that process just a bit, because I found that to be very encouraging.
GuestYeah.
GuestSo I don't give it away.
GuestI won't read it because I won't remember it.
GuestExactly.
GuestBut this is one of the things.
Will SpencerI mean, I could read it this.
GuestIs one of the funny things when you write a book, um, for those who haven't, is, you know, you don't remember every detail you wrote.
GuestUh, and I go back and reread things I've written before.
Will SpencerUm, so, so I said that.
Will SpencerOh, yes.
GuestYeah.
GuestAs far as the conclusion goes, um, from what I recall, I basically, you know, say that, um, the church, there's kind of a trajectory.
GuestThe church slides into egalitarianism, and there's some steps.
GuestAnd so some of those are like, the first I think I list is, well, they're not, they're not reading the older theology, older reformers on these issues.
GuestYou know, I think I say they read, they read the Puritans, but they don't, they don't read the Puritan.
GuestWilliam Googe, you know, he had a very popular book of domestical duties on the family, and they don't read that.
GuestI said, how many pastors, how many pastors are handing out of domestical duties or recommending to their congregants?
GuestYou know, probably not very many.
GuestHopefully that changes.
GuestBut, and then, and then some of it just starts with, like, I think negligence is they're not doing the active things we need to do.
GuestYou know, teaching the scriptures on these passages and reading the reformers, they don't, they don't talk about women outside the home.
GuestThey kind of just let that be.
GuestAnd the next thing you know, you've got all this massive cultural pressure of feminism, and then next thing you know, they're not even speaking on things really in the church significantly.
GuestAnd so that's really, I mean, how I'd summarize it is there's, there's this negligence, and then it leads to, you know, women leading in all sorts of positions.
GuestAnd that, you know, we end up with, like, this very, very narrow practice where it's just like, well, we just, we just won't have a woman as the senior pastor or a woman as the.
GuestWe just won't have a woman president of the college.
GuestWe'll just, you know, you know, have women in leadership all over.
GuestAnd, I mean, how long does that last?
GuestI mean, not very long where, well, we're going to at least keep a man as the senior pastor or president of the institution.
GuestI mean, eventually, if you're putting women in leadership all around, then it's going to lead to, I think, you know, complete capitulation to egalitarianism.
GuestSo I don't know.
GuestWas there anything else you want to add?
GuestI mean, I do know.
GuestI say, like, which way are we going to go, you know, as a church?
GuestAre we going to, are we going to, we're going to follow the path of feminism or are we going to follow the path of our forefathers?
Will SpencerThe, the conclusion that kind of outlined what I liked about it was like, you laid out, this happens first, and then you'll see this happen, and then this happened.
Will SpencerAnd this leads us to this egalitarian or perhaps even inverted kind of situation.
Will SpencerAnd it was those seven steps that you laid out so clearly that it was so intuitive, like, oh, yes, obviously this inverted scenario is where that's going to lead to, and then you're not far from there, from the sparkle creed.
Will SpencerJust throw yourself into it wholeheartedly.
Will SpencerAnd what I found encouraging about that is I think it would help the brethren and the sistren, so to speak, to identify where their church might be in that process and reverse and reverse the trends.
Will SpencerLike, if you're on stage three of a seven step process, you might be able to turn things around, if you can spot it for what it is.
Will SpencerBut of course, if you're at six or seven, perhaps, where it's already a five alarm fire, maybe not so much.
GuestYeah, that's a great point.
GuestAnd I think if you're at this, well, without getting specifics, we can just say if you're, if you're like a narrow complementarianism, you, you can still salvage things, right?
GuestI mean, you know, you don't have women officers in your church or women elders at least, or pastor, you know, you maybe you just, you just need to change some practices.
GuestHey, we've been having women, you know, do a lot of things up front that we shouldn't, we shouldn't be doing.
GuestYou can reverse course on that.
GuestYou can, as a session, actually, like, look into the issue and make a determination and then, and then change course.
GuestAnd like you said it.
GuestSo instead of going down that path of like, well, actually, we're going to consider ordaining women as elders.
GuestI mean, no, you can go back towards a more faithful, you know, traditional reform position.
GuestSo, yeah, for many, I think today it's not too late.
GuestI mean, sometimes your church turns completely egalitarian and then, you know, you probably, if you're a member there or whatever, you probably just have to leave.
GuestBut, I mean, I have heard of occasional situations where pastors have gone in.
GuestI don't think this is common.
GuestBut, you know, maybe of women elders and their female elders, and they're actually, they have, like, concerns about this.
GuestI mean, they don't think this is ideal and they're willing to even step down.
GuestAnd so that does happen.
GuestSo, yeah, I mean, I think we should be just positive in that.
GuestYeah, this stuff's messy.
GuestThere's a lot of problems in the church.
GuestBut I do think we should always be repenting and always be seeking greater faithfulness towards the Lord and all things.
GuestAnd we can correct wrongs.
GuestWe might have made mistakes in the past.
GuestWe might have given into feminism in some ways, caved into culture, but we can, for the most part, reverse course, and it might bring some hardship.
GuestIt doesn't mean it's going to be easy, but that's what repentance looks like, and that's what faithfulness to God looks like.
GuestSo hopefully that's at least an encouraging note to end on, is that there is hope for improvement and greater faithfulness in these areas.
Will SpencerAmen.
Will SpencerThat's very encouraging, especially because of the work that you've done in your two books.
Will SpencerI'll just hold them up real quick.
Will SpencerHonor thy fathers.
Will SpencerAnd masculine Christianity paints such a clear picture.
Will SpencerThis is what it looks like.
Will SpencerAnd here are the arguments that feminists and egalitarians marshal to misinterpret scripture.
Will SpencerHere's what it actually means, and here's what our reformed forefathers once said.
Will SpencerAnd putting the two books together, of course, here's what it looks like in our modern world.
Will SpencerAnd so that clear picture that you've painted, it's a wake up call.
Will SpencerLike, oh, this is not what it's supposed to look like.
Will SpencerThis is what it is supposed to look like, and we can start working our way back there.
GuestAbsolutely.
Will SpencerAmen.
Will SpencerWell, this has been a fantastic conversation yet again.
Will SpencerThank you so much for coming on the show, and thank you so much for writing your books.
Will SpencerWhere would you like to send people to find out more about you and what you do?
GuestYeah, you can find message and Christianity on Amazon.
GuestHonor thy fathers.
GuestAt least the ebook is on Amazon.
GuestOtherwise you have to go to the new Christendom press page for the hardback.
GuestBut hey, it's worth having the hardback.
GuestI think it's a nice addition.
GuestOtherwise people can go to my website.
GuestI write fairly regularly@knowingscripture.com.
Guestcomma.
GuestThat's more Bible based articles.
GuestSometimes I write for other websites, but, yeah, otherwise you can follow me on Twitter acerygarris.
Will SpencerWonderful, wonderful.
Will SpencerWell, thank you.
Will SpencerReal quick, do you have another book planned, or is there something in the works?
GuestI am working on a project with a friend, Sean McGowan, on the southern Presbyterians so it's more of a historical.
GuestI mean, I guess this last book was somewhat hysterical, but at church, I've been teaching through american presbyterian church history, and I've been heavily, you know, kind of studying the southerners in particular.
GuestAnd so I think that book will be useful because there's not a lot on the southern presbyterian church.
GuestI mean, that's the.
GuestWell, the mother church of the PCA.
GuestThe PCA actually came out of the southern presbyterian church in 1973, and there's a lot of interesting history there.
GuestAnd, yeah, I mean, I love the reformers, but I also love american Presbyterians.
GuestSo I hope this will be of use, and I certainly think it'll be interesting.
GuestWe've uncovered a lot of information and probably gone through more books than I had hoped to.
Will SpencerYou mean, you also had a really nice appearance.
Will SpencerI think I'm gonna get the date wrong, but I think it's the 1607 project.
GuestYes.
Will SpencerI was very happy to see you in that documentary.
GuestYeah.
Will SpencerMaybe you could talk about that for just a minute.
GuestYeah, yeah, real briefly.
GuestSo that was with the Abbeville Institute, and I had written articles for them several years back, and then I got asked to contribute an essay on religion in Virginia because that was a.
GuestThis is for the 1607 project book.
GuestThey also did a book, America first.
GuestSo I contributed that chapter.
GuestAnd actually, that's kind of what got me started on writing on the southern Presbyterians is I was.
GuestI mean, I had read a lot on, like, Robert Louis Dabney and some other guys, but I ended up really diving in to other southern figures like John Holt Rice.
GuestHe was an important guy in Virginia.
GuestBut there's also Archibald Alexander was from Virginia.
GuestHe was the first professor of theology at Princeton Seminary in 1812.
GuestSo he's kind of a big name.
GuestI mean, his student is the most famous.
GuestIt was Charles Hodge.
GuestBut, yeah, there's just a lot of great history there.
GuestAnd so then I was asked to be in the documentary the Virginia first, the 1607 project.
GuestSo that's available on YouTube.
GuestIt's free.
GuestAnd I think it's great.
GuestIt's got a lot of good history.
GuestIt's kind of contrasting Virginia with, like, the New England Puritans.
GuestAnd I certainly think there's good of both groups.
GuestBut there are some, like some things you see at least note here is, you know, I think.
GuestI think, you know, the south's referred to as the Bible belt still today, and kind of orthodox Christianity survived longer in the south.
GuestSo there's.
GuestWe can discuss why that's the case, you know, there's differing opinions, but the fact is I think there's something healthy about, you know, Southern Christianity.
Will SpencerYeah, John Harris and I talked a little bit about that when he was on the podcast that came out a couple weeks ago at this point in time.
Will SpencerBut it was maybe when you finished this book on southern Presbyterians, because I think a lot of people in America don't really understand where the different Presbyterian denominations came from.
Will SpencerAnd there is a very large Baptist to Presbyterian pipeline that's happening right now.
Will SpencerCertainly I had my own journey through that.
Will SpencerI think that could be a really interesting thing to inform people, like, well, the traditions in America, the denominational traditions, they have specific roots in specific places and times that I think we can feel, but that we don't necessarily know.
Will SpencerBecause what's the joke that church history for american Protestants began with Billy Graham?
Will SpencerSomething like that.
GuestYeah, I don't like that joke because that's unfortunately an insult to probably what many people believe.
GuestYeah, I mean, Presbyterian, part of the problem is Presbyterian history is kind of complicated because it came out of, came out of Scotland.
GuestI mean, it has its roots in the reformation, like, you know, Calvinism and reformed theology, but came out of Scotland and, but then you have the american presbyterian church.
GuestIt's its own thing, but you have splits and divisions, new school, old school, and then northern southern church and then reunions and then liberalism in the, in the 20th century.
GuestSo a lot of it gets, there's definitely some like, you know, complicated factors involved, which is why it's been great on my part to teach through it, but also really dive into the, to the sources.
GuestAnd so hopefully, yeah, I mean, I think the book's gonna be pretty long, but it's gonna have a lot of biography in it and theology, and I think people will like that.
GuestBut even I could probably do some interviews and, like, explain some of the details, make it a little clearer for people, give them big, big picture information on, like, american Presbyterianism that hopefully will be useful.
GuestBecause like I said, I like both the 16th and 17th century reform theologians.
GuestI think we should embrace them.
GuestBut I also think there's a lot of good to embrace from the american Presbyterians.
Will SpencerI agree.
Will SpencerAnd I think as America tries to find its way forward with its christian identity in terms of christian nationalism, what does that actually look like?
Will SpencerWhat actually is our christian history in America?
Will SpencerBecause it's kind of fuzzy.
Will SpencerOnce you get past 19 hundreds looking backwards, it's fuzzy for a lot of people.
Will SpencerBut I do think that those themes are still very present, but we don't know how to recognize them, perhaps.
GuestYeah.
GuestAnd maybe if I could just add one thing here is one of the interesting things with the American Presbyterians is they kind of bridge the gap.
GuestSo if we're talking christian nationalism, like christian government and things like that, is, you know, most people we know what we have today, we might read about the reformers.
GuestOh, they had like, you know, christian magistrates and things like that.
GuestBut what you have in the United States is that the early colonies were christian for the most part.
GuestI mean, you had different levels of establishment.
GuestI mean, you had like the, you know, New England Puritans had the congregational church, but then in the south you had a lot of anglican establishments, but then they had strong dissenters like the Presbyterians, Baptists, and then eventually the Methodists, which came out of the Anglicans.
GuestBut what's interesting is, like, so you had this kind of transition is, you know, people always say the First Amendment, freedom of religion, those kind of things, but that actually was only a prohibition on the federal government from establishing a church.
GuestBut the states were trying to sort out, well, how are we going to do things?
GuestSo, like, Virginia had to disestablish their church before.
GuestBefore the US Constitution, right before.
GuestAnd then, you know, some of the other states, like South Carolina actually for twelve years, had a general establishment that allowed for like, just the generally established Christianity.
GuestNow, they didn't keep it, but a lot of those states did keep like, requirements that magistrates were Protestants even.
GuestThey had to affirm the protestant religion.
GuestAnd eventually, over time, some of that stuff just kind of faded away and, you know, we became more pluralistic in the United States.
GuestBut, yeah, I think it's the history there is at least interesting.
GuestAnd it certainly shows that while I wouldn't say America was strictly a christian country, because in one sense, we're a republic, we did have like christian states within the republic.
GuestAnd so, yeah, I mean, that's just, that's just the history there is.
GuestAmerica at one point was like 98% protestant and mostly british origin, and with immigration and things started to change in the 18 hundreds.
GuestBut, yeah, so a lot of history there that people just unfortunately are unfamiliar with.
GuestBut I think hopefully we can change that.
GuestHopefully it's starting to change some now and we'll continue to change it in the future.
Will SpencerWell, I definitely look forward to that book coming out and reading it and we can, we can have another conversation like this one.
Will SpencerI've enjoyed our chats.
GuestYeah, absolutely.
GuestI'd be glad to do that at some point.
Will SpencerCool.
Will SpencerWell, thank you so much, Zach.
Will SpencerThis has been great, and definitely, everyone, go out and buy, honor thy fathers and provoke a feminist today.